Those are impressive numbers. Sincerely, I'm sure I never hear about them because they're so well behaved.
He's such a hard worker he took 15 minutes out of his packed schedule to lean out of a widow with a box of fries.
Is this a narcissism thing? The lies and acting are comically bad. It's mindboggling that he would pose with fries handed to him, served to no actual paying customer, and proceed to speak as if he now has proper experience among the working class.
This is his most absurd photo op yet. I do not believe he is certified to handle food. If he doesn't know how not to contaminate food then he'd be putting the health of customers in danger.
I was close to leaving. At first I'd been given the impression that "liberal" is a dirty word on Lemmy. It helps that PSAs like this one routinely appear on other instances to inform newcomers. Just keep spreading the knowledge and let it be known that everybody should block those communities.
That was an enlightening article. It seems like CIG has serious problems with leadership and budget expenditure. I can't call the game a scam since they at least have something tangible in the works, but they don't inspire confidence as to when or if they'll fully deliver.
I'm glad I never got on this ship. I'm not a big fan of buying into unfinished games with grandiose promises.
Did he really have a change of heart just because he got in trouble with Twitch? We know how he is. It's pretty strange to see him walk back any statements after getting backlash. As far as I know he's always been the unapologetic, uncancellable degenerate who lives with rats rotting on the floor and his own blood staining the walls.
A big one for me is that you can tweak the priority of specific domains. in my case I hate Fandom but I don't want to block it entirely, so I lower it and raise the other wikis I'd rather see first. I also have every Pinterest domain blocked, which would be very tedious to do with search engine operators.
Is it really worth making this kind of statement regarding the DEI thing? The self-proclaimed "anti-woke" crowd wants you to give their bigotry fuel by playing defense. Then they're going to get on YouTube and upload another shitty rant with a soyface thumbnail and a 3-word headline.
If you can ban them in your spaces then do so by all means. Do not enter their space if you are an honest person. This is a battle won by persuasive rhetoric, not facts and logic.
I don't know how to get climate change deniers to accept the conclusions. It's team sports to them. They think they need to absolutely deny it just because they'd boost liberal talking points if they gave the slightest concession to the climate change discourse.
They're several years late, but they're finally realizing he's full of shit.
I like how they cover all their cases just in case of the very small possibility this doesn't get a sovcit a free house.
It's optional and not the default control scheme. This is only good.
We don't have to respond seriously to that, right? He's clearly non-decent. Pointing and laughing seems like the appropriate response.
No, they just equate "neutrality" with their way being the status quo. It is a very intentional choice to shift the Overton window by insisting that this is neutrality.
It's in a more or less acceptable state now and I play it, but it sure doesn't live up to the original 10 year live service promise.
I don't believe I could be a good partner. I abandon anything the instant it loses novelty. There is no way I could naturally perform my role in a relationship every day. I may even be the kind of person who would start cheating if they got a taste for relationships but couldn't commit to a person. I'd rather not open that box of possibilities. It's easier to be my impulsive self alone.
