We're a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.
We'll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it's fun.
We'll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.
Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.
Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed in frustration? All to later be referred to as bragging rights?
These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We're already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren't shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We've been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that's already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they've threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can't is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.
Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You're not special, you're not original, you're not the first; this is just another boss fight.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. People fought wars to end monarchy, slavery, fascism. Wanting to be left alone isn't the mark of a good person. Good deeds are what make a good person. It is your actions, not your beliefs, that make you a good person.
You don't need to bombard people with your ideas. You need to stand up for them.
I find it hilarious that the reason these payment companies requested sites pull their NSFW content was due to direct action by a puritanical activist group but people upset by it not only don't care enough to participate in direct action themselves but won't even put their real name on a petition. Recently signed by: Crazy crazysmile. Thanks for the support Mr. Crazysmile!
Say what you want about right wing nut jobs, but they at least care enough about their ideas that they go out and make a difference.
They're both "linters". They analyze your code without executing it, known as "static analysis", and highlight logical and stylistic errors.
Pylint will give you warnings if you try to feed a variable that holds an integer into a function that works on strings or if you deviate from python's suggested style guide. Python doesn't check data types until you actually run your code, so errors with data types won't be caught until your program crashes. Using pylint allows you to get warnings before actually executing your code. Note that Python allows for type hinting which allows you to tell linters what data types variables and functions are allowed to be. Python itself ignores type hints when executing code.
Black automatically formats your code to adhere to Python's suggested style guide. Unlike something like Pylint, it cannot be configured to ignore certain style rules. All projects using Black will have the same style. Python gives a lot of leeway in how you can format valid code, but it's difficult for programmers to read code in dozens of different styles. Most languages have come up with their own style guide. For example, your first line does not match the suggested style. All imports should be on their own line. If you don't want to remeber all the rules yourself, you can use Black to format your code in a way everyone is agreeable with.
Definitely! That's why I said it's possible non-consenting stuff took place after the video ends. It's entirely possible, but people don't go to jail because it's possible they committed a crime.
I also don't believe that the Crown even argued that consent was revoked. I believe their argument was she was too drunk to consent so what she said in the video doesn't matter. Again, possible, but they couldn't prove that beyond a doubt.
I'm not a lawyer either, but reading the judge's verdict, it sounds like the only evidence the prosecution had was the woman's testimony. The defence had video recordings of the women verbally consenting. Kinda hard to prove beyond a doubt that the woman did not consent when it's on video. Not that some non-consenting stuff didn't happen when the video was turned off but again, a guilty verdict requires no doubt.
That's what the CBC article is about. How sexual assault victims often don't come forward since securing a conviction is incredibly difficult on testimony alone.
CTV news is doing live updates on the ruling. The judge is going over evidence that seems to suggest the complainant was sober and consented. No official ruling yet, but I don't think the judge starting off by saying the woman's testimony is not credible leads to a guilty verdict.
I'm the only one in my friend group that watches anime and it led to them making lots of pedo jokes at my expense. I'm not a pedo and my friends know that. It's just a running joke. And then they make a joke when someone new is around and everyone needs to explain I'm not actually a pedo...
Please don't judge my sleep schedule, Nagatoro-san!