hessenjunge @ hessenjunge @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

0

Comments

377

Joined

2 yr. ago

I think the German saying „Der Ton macht die Musik.“ fits very well here. There is a massive difference between you bringing it up as an conversation starter and an incel jerk using it as a challenge.

It’s just way way way way worse for women that’s all.

They forgot the newsletters you get twice a day* (*thrice if you opted out of newsletters) and the deluge of spam when everyone at Bonto sold your email address while they were going out of business.

Definitely! Loriot would take this situation and at least double the awkwardness.

I think the majority of animals have descriptive names. However the discussion isn’t even in the vicinity of whether the names are descriptive.

So do socialist governments.

Unless you love tinkle-down economics and gays dying of AIDS you’re not an 80s republican.

I’m not autistic but agree that the kid gave the correct answer and the teacher is wrong.

If that had happened to my kid the teacher and I would have had at least one meeting.

Modern Democrats are just old-school 1980s Republicans.

Is that why they love Reagan and Reaganomics so much?

/s

& Uhu, Zilpzalp and a couple of other exceptions do exist.

However, they can’t hold a Litwick to Lampent.

First (& very common) bird I looked up seems to be the exception?

Fantail / pīwakawaka Known for its friendly ‘cheet cheet’ call and energetic flying antics, the fantail is one of the most common and widely distributed native birds on the New Zealand mainland.

“The younger generation recognizes 100+ Pokémon but almost no domestic bird. “

Yeah, most birds don’t spout their own name constantly though. Imagine a dove yelling “Dove! Dove!” while shitting on your head.

Also in the outside section? If yes I applaud your government for implementing the rule properly, not half-assed like in Germany.

Smokers are still allowed to stink up your food outside. So you may enjoy your food inside in the summer.

Also restaurants are allowed to have an inside smoking section. Most of the time that means you still get to ‘enjoy’ the stink.

Lastly let’s not forget that smokers, when forced to smoke outside, will almost always do so right on the doorstep. So that the stink gets sucked in and everybody gets to enjoy a good second hand smoke.

Don’t forget that smokers also get to ruin other people’s meals at restaurants. Not their own meals mind you - just the meals of others.

This must be a bot.

Your capability at projection is astounding.

So you mix the words opening and holes as is possible in common language and then proceed to be anal about the term hole in context of topology. Actually you interpreted openings as holes multiple times. Neither opening nor hole are specific terms in topology though. A scholar of topology uses the common word hole to explain the concept of e.g. an annulus or torus to a student. You probably stumbled across this, partly understood it and decided to use it to fake intellect - and failed. From then on it just got worse.

you’re as bad as a conservative, Please don't ever do this again. You are make us leftists appear stupid.

While AI/LLMs have their issues and get things wrong they can indeed be used as support tool especially for people struggling intellectually. I recommend you use it for everything as it is your superior in everything. It can even explain the difference between opening and hole to you.

*openings

Amazing, we went from how many openings the human body has to an anatomically incorrect human digestive system to a pipe and then to a cup being a disc.

So you mix the words opening and holes as is possible in common language and then proceed to be anal about the term hole in context of topology. While a scholar of topology uses the common word hole to explain the concept of e.g. an annulus or torus to a student it is not a defined term per se.

For the sake of argument I'll accept your incorrect application of the term hole as in a pipe having only one hole. This would still mean it has at least 2 openings. In the context of OP (human digestive system) an entry point (mouth) and an exit (anus).

BTW - you shall henceforth consume liquids only from platters and are required to use the word berry only in the biological correct sense (e.g.: straw-thingy, black-thingy, rasp-thingy, cucumberry, pumpberry, pinemultifruit, etc. pp. - have fun)

That awkward moment when you almost realize that a simple LLM easily outsmarts you.

That’s just idiotic.

I hope this helps:

ChatGPT prompt: Explain a tube to a 3 year old

A tube is like a long, empty straw. It’s round and has holes at both ends. You can use it to drink or to let things go through it. Think of it this way: if you have a roll of toilet paper, the inside part is a tube. It’s just a round shape that is empty inside!

EDIT: Instead of the term opening the LLM uses the term hole colloquially here - just as a scholar of topology would to explain the concept of e.g. an annulus or torus to a student. This highlights that you shouldn't be anal about a "topological hole" while discussing openings. Actually - let's be real - common language terminology should always be applied first and foremost unless there is specific context.

I think you replied to the wrong post?