Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ET
emdash [comrade/them, comrade/them] @ emdash @hexbear.net
Posts
1
Comments
34
Joined
2 mo. ago

  • No, but it was pretty straightforward when I was still on the site. I heard they recently added "Luigi" to the list, so if someone used to talk about Nintendo games a lot you can potentially do something funny.

    Moderator accounts also have their reports prioritized, so if you get added to some random subreddits as a mod you can even see instant bans in response to your reports. Only a couple of the report reasons go straight to the admins, including the "advocating violence" one, and the "promoting hate" one. But the "hate" report seemed to take a lot longer to be acted on and have much softer consequences. Whereas if I reported some fascist who wanted to depopulate the Earth, after the third report I'd often instantly get a message saying "we've taken action" and then their account would be gone.

    It's worth noting that they do also keep tabs on "report abuse" now, so you can potentially get shadowbanned for this stuff.

    The source for most of this is either from personal experience, or straight from the Reddit admin team at one of their ridiculous Zoom events.

  • They outsourced almost all admin-level moderation (site-wide bans) to a bot service a few years ago and now you're at the mercy of user reports. If someone reports you for "inciting violence" and your comment contains a keyword, it's an immediate warning. If someone does it to several comments simultaneously, you get three strikes and an immediate ban. Last time I looked at the site (a while ago) you could even trigger it on comments talking about "killing time".

  • This is too real. Talking to average liberals makes me want to tear my hairs out, because everything they have to say about politics is just a parroted thing they heard someone else say, or at best you get an "original thought" which is an attempt at a gotcha that is dispelled by even the most basic of research.

    If you're vegan you're probably familiar with the fallacy bingo card. There is nothing more frustrating to me that talking to another vegan and the conversation turns to politics and suddenly they are spouting all kinds of liberal fallacies and refuse to reflect upon the fact that they are doing exactly the same thing they shit on carnists for doing.

    [Lenin yelling emoticon]

  • Reading the comments on this really is interesting. They've got some alternate history going on:

    Communist revolutions have always been led by elites who claim to speak for the masses. That’s exactly how Mao rose to power.

  • The point is that people severely exaggerate how "unusable" a degoogled phone is. There are FOSS alternatives to most things, and anything there isn't an alternative to is probably a shitty service that you'd be better off without (see: burger apps)

  • Before, political cartoons were shown primarily in a local context (or in international papers to an audience that was more aware of political things) so labels weren't needed. These days, political memes are disseminated online to an international audience who don't necessarily know what every single US politician looks like. I have no idea who the person on the left is without a label, for example, besides "that person who said 'we're all going to die.'"

    This doesn't strike me as an example of over-labelling, the way that gets satirized in Kelly comics.

  • chapotraphouse @hexbear.net

    When I start to type 'hexbear' into my URL bar, my phone suggests 'Hezbollah'. Coincidence?