Skip Navigation

Posts
19
Comments
786
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Ok sure, but... you know what else has never happened in history? Trump beating Biden.

    Personally I can't wait to vote for Biden and vote against Trump, doubly so if Trump's legal situation continues to get worse over the next year. Trump's misery is our pleasure.

  • Great news and I'm sure that more will follow.

  • There are only a finite number of easily purchasable game dev assets out there, but in theory there is a nearly infinite of assets that can be generated by AI.

    Mark my words, soon we're gonna be inundated with lot of really shitty, mostly AI-generated games by con artists trying to make a quick buck.

  • Looks pretty heave g-good, Sweden...

  • Well... Who's ready for an endless stream of low quality AI asset flips?

    We've already seen what AI-generated books have done to platforms like Amazon. I suspect that this will eventually be the end of "open" uncurated digital storefronts, since AI will eventually allow for crappy content to be produced at a faster rate than it can be consumed and it'll become impossible to discover anything worthwhile.

  • Bring in a billion dollars of investor money.

    Hire thousands and thousands of employees.

    Spend way more than you bring in every year.

    Hire some shitty CEO with a terrible track record. Pay him way too much money.

    Become desperate for cash and think of ways to milk your users dry.

    Get rid of bad CEO and pay him even more money.

    Then when all that backfires and you've further tanked your reputation you go back to the drawing board and realize the only option to cut losses is to fire half your staff, or more.

    And that's the story of Unity3d.

  • I feel like I've given my answer to this question regarding Beehaw once before...

    But as I see it, the main driving force and overall source of value for services like Lemmy, Kbin, Mastodon, etc., is federation. That is to say, federation among a wide variety of different users and servers across the fediverse using protocols like ActivityPub is what sets this entire thing apart from legacy centralized and corporate social media, like Reddit or "X".

    I was initially on Beehaw myself and I liked the mature and kind atmosphere, but I ended up splitting for Kbin due to issues with defederation (on top of being curious and interested in Kbin as an alternative software to lemmy). But whether we're talking about "Beehaw.org" or "Kbin.social", in my view the federation is a huge part of the appeal, and I wouldn't see myself continuing to use a server if it cut itself off from the rest of the network, regardless of whether they did it for "good reasons" or not.

    Like, if Beehaw wants to be just a significantly smaller and more highly moderated centralized alternative to Reddit, that feels like a pretty weak pitch which, at best, might end up with a community roughly the size of a classic forum. I'm not really interested in that. I want the Fediverse to succeed as a decentralized, open, scalable, and community-moderated alternative to legacy social media. Frankly, my interest in Beehaw as a community hinges completely on it being a part of that movement or not.

    I can understand how federation may have posed significant challenges towards your goal of detailed moderation and creating a safe and friendly space, but only in the sense that you were possibly not fully prepared for the level of exposure to a large number of federated users. But even so, if Beehaw is ever to grow into something bigger (which, to be honest, is not a given, especially if you set out on your own as just another disconnected and insular social media website), you will eventually have to deal with the harsh reality that the kind of moderation that you're interested in doing is going to be a significant challenge as your community scales, federated or not. (For example, you may be prepared to moderate content in English, but are you prepared to moderate content in other languages? How will you know when someone starts spreading disinformation and hate speech in Burmese?)

    Finally, I think you might want to consider the general movement towards federated social media. Between ActivityPub and the Fediverse, Meta's interest in federating Threads, BlueSky being developed around federation to some extent, federation support in things like WordPress, and a number of other social media platforms tip-toeing their way into the idea, I personally feel that there is a pretty interesting paradigm shift happening right now. Some of that has to do with moderation, responsibility and government pressure on big tech, I think.

    But nevertheless, social media is gradually moving towards federation, and I think that's a good thing for the internet as a whole. You nice people at Beehaw will really have to search yourselves to determine whether you see the value in federation (both in terms of connecting people, but also in terms of allowing various communities to self-moderate to some extent) or not.

    I do hope you'll stay, even though it means facing the growing pains of moderation challenges sooner rather than later, because the fediverse is better with us all connected and communicating together. I'll be sticking with the fediverse with or without Beehaw, but I do wish you all luck in your goals should you decide to set out on your own.

  • If there is no justice, there can be no peace.

    Oh ok, "no peace"... So then you want war in Gaza.

    Good luck with your war, amigo.

  • "Safe space", huh? You argue like Ron Desantis.

    Next thing you'll be calling me "woke" because you clearly don't have a leg to stand on or a brain to think with.

    Of the 14 hostages treated by Eitan’s team, nine are under 18 and two are under 10. Most need long-term treatment for trauma.

    Go ahead and explain to us how 9 teens and 2 children are guilty of oppressing anyone.
    Or maybe you hear "jew" in your head and can't help but create some kind of twisted mental image?

    Either way, I'll wait for your top mind to come up with an answer, because I just love a good laugh.

  • They're either too stupid to read or too biased to read.

    Either way, they're probably beyond help at this point. It's frankly just sad at this point.

  • What the fuck are you even talking about? Seriously, did you even take 3 minutes to read the article?

    These people, who were (and still are) being taken captive by Hamas, are not "the oppressors" by any stretch.

    They are innocent people (in this case women and children) who were taken captive by terrorists and murderers, brought into a terrifying war zone, physically and sexually abused, drugged without consent, kept in 1x1.5 animal cages, kept in pitch black darkness, deprived of food, water, medication, and never knowing whether they or their families are going to die.

    You shouldn't have to choose between sympathy to the innocent people of Gaza who are suffering in this war, and the innocent people of Israel who are also suffering. The fact that you even feel the need to "choose a side" or complain about media bias here is a stain on your soul and you should be fucking ashamed of that.

    Happy New Year, bitch.

  • You probably shouldn't have...

    Among the 14 freed hostages treated at her centre, she said, were child hostages who had been drugged by their captors – including with ketamine – and were suffering from withdrawal, those who had subjected to or witnessed sexual abuse, a woman who had been kept in a tiny [1 x 1.5m, with another woman] cage, and another who had a breakdown after being kept in complete darkness for days.

    Rather than picking a side between the IDF and Hamas, be on the side of the innocent people on both sides of this war who are victims of unspeakable atrocities. It's not hard for me. It shouldn't be hard for you. And if it is, that speaks to the darkness of bias and hatred within you.

  • Well yeah, nobody is forcing you to visit any country.

    But if I voluntarily travel somewhere and feel like I'm constantly battling against the risk-reward schemes of dishonest merchants (who aren't just selling trinkets or tickets to toueist attractions, but also potentially inflating the price of basic things like food, drinks and transportation at every opportunity), I'm personally far less likely to have a good time or return for a second visit. The amount of money isn't even the problem, it's the feeling of being taken advantage of or needing to haggle over a bottle of water.

    (Again, I haven't been to India so I have no clue to what degree this is or isn't a problem.)

    If you don't care then that's fine, but I'd rather spend 10x the money traveling to a place where I have friendly and honest interactions than save money by visiting a place where everybody is looking at me like a potential mark or some kind of loot goblin. That's all I'm saying.

  • The money one would be perfectly fine if it was an explicitly stated official policy where Indians get cheaper access to their own tourist attractions and cultural sites. I think it probably starts to get annoying if everything you pay for is marked up by some amount on the spot by chancers who are taking advantage of your naivety. I haven't been to India so I don't know if this is a big problem or a rare occurrence, but I have heard of it happening before, typically in poorer countries.

    Lifting people out of poverty by giving them honest jobs with livable wages is probably the only way to fix this, because poverty creates desperation and desperation can lead some people to petty theft, or a host of other personal and social problems.

  • Or better yet just stop using dropbox.