Horse archers, or skirmishing units in general, are countered by archers or siege units. Unless the game is wildly unbalanced it always works.
One exception to it : fascists managed to convince people who can only lose stuff to a war that it's good for them too.
You might as well warn about the sun eating the earth and turning it into hell. It's not too soon, only 5 billion years left.
And yet 2 centuries ago some people were already thinking, exactly like you, that there was too many humans for the earth to sustain them. You can see how wrong he was. The fact that you refuse to learn from past mistakes is quite telling though.
Si la macronie explose, le NFP n'a pas besoin d'inclure des centristes. Il peut y avoir un nouveau groupe de centre gauche qui coopère avec le NFP comme LIOT le fait régulièrement
You know who thought like you? Thomas Malthus. 2 centuries ago.
No nuclear accident has the ability to end life on earth. It is not a possibility.
And humans in the past would regularly suffer from famine and epidemic, and child death was crazy (as was mother death during birth).
You probably missed the part were current AI are reproducing inequalities already.
Meanwhile middle age fantasy had black knights and it was fine.
Racists are gonna be racists is all there is.
Facile, les français n'ont pas bien compris la question. Alors on ne va pas tenir compte de leur avis et faire plus de pédagogie : la gauche c'est mal OK ?
No, a language is not just a language. I fact, it's a bunch of compilers. How many there are and the hardware they work on is what matters.
And as a matter of fact, rust isn't as much of an industry standard as C++ is.
Y a differents types de proportionnelles. Celle qui a été utilisée en France il y a 30 ou 40 ans, c'était une liste par région je crois. De cette façon c'est proportionnel, et ça garde un ancrage local.
It makes it more dangerous : the sting is attach to the venom bag, so the venom bag gets to empty itself whole if it stays. Evolution would have chosen the survival of the hive, not the survival of the bee.
One thing is weird though : you can extract the sting of a wasp with a pincer. The wasp will live through it. Why do the bee dies when it loses it's sting and not the wasp?
"tout les hommes" ne veut pas dire "chaque homme". C'est la distinction entre le groupe et les individus. C'est de la sociologie. Spécifiquement ici, il s'agit du fait qu'il n'y a pas de sociologie spécifique des violeurs en dehors du fait qu'ils sont des hommes. Le fait qu'ils soient des hommes est le seul point commun entre eux.
Your mistake is to consider an election is a rational competition. It's not. Not anymore, because medias make it impossible to know the truth. So it is more like a football match. People have the team they support, and for most nothing will change their mind because there's too much propaganda. When almost everything is propaganda, you get to choose the reality you "prefer".
So the point of the campaign is more about convincing people to vote in order to defeat the opposing team. Or to persuade the other team to concede.
As a matter of fact, satire does not work. Fascists will idolize the fascists in satire, always. It feels like satire only works with people who already have an education about the dangers of fascism.
In the broken mind of a fascist, satire is actually a kind of utopia. It's how the world is supposed to be in their twisted ideals.
J'avais pas vu ça a l'époque, mais la situation est un peu différente aujourd'hui : le nfp a la majorité au bureau de l'AN. Cette fois il y a donc une chance que ça aille vers un vote devant l'assemblée.
That's blatantly wrong. There is a tradition in France for all parties to ally to prevent the fascists from accessing power, but that's only an election alliance. It barely worked for the last election : the left does vote against the fascists every time, but some liberals refused to stand back in favor of some left candidates, and liberal voters largely refused to vote for the left because of the anti-left propaganda. This lead to the fascists making a third of the assemblé nationale.
Now the president must choose a prime minister, but the left arrived first, and he refuses to let them get the power. So he waits for anyone to accept an alliance with the liberals which is not happening yet.
Predictions are going that he will end choosing a PM that is fascist compatible rather than letting the left have any power in the executive.
Il avait un programme politique exceptionnel, mais il était au PS avec Hollande, et il s'est poignardé dans le dos par l'aile droite du PS qui est parti soutenir macron. C'était pas vraiment que c'était pas le bon moment, c'était plutôt le pire contexte pour proposer ce programme. Le PS 1vait son étiquette de traître, et il ne s'en est pas désolidarisé. Beaucoup se souvenaient encore de Hollande qui prétendait que son ennemi était la finance...