baduhai @ baduhai @sopuli.xyz

Just someone running away from Reddit.

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

502

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

I've recently started using windows again for work, after not touching it for like 15 years, msys2 makes it tolerable.

I'm a devops engineer, and my company won't allow me to use WSL. Go figure.

Here at sopuli.xyz the admin seems pretty light on defederalising.

TachiJ2K is the fork that debuted bulk migration, and, while relatively inactive, it's technically still maintained. It's very much feature complete though, so I wouldn't much about it not being super maintained.

Personally, I've been using Yokai, it's basically J2K, but actively maintained and getting feature updates.

I'm partial towards bato.to. It used to be the aggregator before MangaDex came around, it even had ads and revenue share with the scanlators who uploaded there. Alas it eventually got a massive DMCA just like the MangaDex one, and combined with constant DDOSes and overall maintainer burnout, it died. It recently came back under different ownership and seems to be a very complete aggregator, which leans even harder on the piracy aspect, as it hosts official translations.

Got it, thanks.

I read that, but my question still stands.

Not sure I entirely understand this, would this function as a replacement for the *arr stack?

I'm allergic to subscriptions, but I might just consider it.

What? The two things have nothing to do with each other. A GNU operating system doesn't need to be open source or have its source code available anywhere. A GNU operating system just means it uses GNU tools.

You could write a new kernel from scratch, never distribute a single character of the source code, make an operating system with your new kernel along with GNU tools, and even sell your operating system, which the GPL allows for. The GNU tools would still be open source, sure, but your operating system would be neither open source, nor have its source code completely available.

Which means it isn't truly open source, just that the source code is available.

Don't get me wrong, I love that the source for TF2 is available, but it's not open source.

I've heard the term source available be used, though not sure how popular it is.

You can follow whatever you think is best. I'll stick to and evangilise what I view to be the correct definition of open source.

Ubuntu is not FSF approved, and guess what, it's still a GNU operating system

What makes Ubuntu a GNU operating system isn't the fact that it's FSF approved, it's the fact that it uses GNU tools.

Huh, I would like to see that.

No, those would not be open source.

Definition of Open Source: https://opensource.org/osd

ContraPoints is fantastic, but I have a hard time watching the content if I'm not in the headspace for it.

Just to be pedantic, if the source is available, but there are restrictions on how the source is used, it's not open source.

Open source licenses do not forbid anyone from using the source code for any purpose.

Eh, I wouldn't turn myself down, but I'd certainly not go out of my way to hit on me. I'm not really my type.

I know exactly what they UN is, and my comment reflects that.

Thin phone are stupid, they always have a big camera bump.

"This decision also sends a clear message to the international community: states cannot violate international law with impunity."

And how have they been punished, exactly?

"We call upon Russia to finally face up to its responsibility for this horrific act of violence and make reparations for its egregious conduct, as required under international law,"

You call upon them? So they haven't been punished and won't be, got it.