Many plagues were caused by lack of basic hygiene. Of course I wouldn't want to miss modern medicine, but living back then with a lot less people around and equipped with todays knowledge would actually be pretty neat.
....but not with my teeth....i would have probably died already if not for modern ways of dealing with tooth-aches....
I may have oversimplified my statement. Of course an objective description of reality is impossible. A curse on all social sciences and statistics.
My post was more a showerthought...even if the data is incomplete, whatever THAT data implies will also be the stereotype the AI will learn. Misrepresentation of minorities in sample data is absolutely nothing new.
But even if the data WAS complete, it would probably still be very biased. I think we often don't notice structural discrimination and AI would simply reproduce those and confront us with it. In that sense I think it is a very interesting way to get a sort of 'outside look' at our own society and that is something that's very useful.
I wonder if this is because AI is trained on data that 'is' and has therefore no concept of how it 'should be'. Maybe it is an effective mirror of society....
Thank you very much for your answer. Very interesting therapies they are testing and I'll have a look if there are similar studies done here in Germany. I wish you all the best for your future and really hope, that they will find a way to completely treat it.
But also is cross-immunisation. So...one could have had something other than Covid-19 and still be immune to it. Then there are also the genetic outliers that are just naturally immune to the attack-vector of the virus.
A long time ago we actually agreed on a process for fact finding. It is one that has served us well for hundreds of years (more so in the last 150 years, once we really had a foundational understanding of the world based on previously established facts).
The whole "you look at the world, draw conclusions and test them" - system is not new and it works. That is science. It's not a question of what people believe to be fact, but in believing in the process of establishing them. One side is systematically trying to undermine the very basis of science. It is impossible to use science or data or facts to convince someone like that that their position is wrong.
Because redditors aren't the customers but the product. What reddit is selling to its advertisers are people that do exactly what you said. Complain but not change.
I tried Chatgpt, but got no result. Maybe you could give it a try. It always asked for more context, which I was unable to give...