Shyfer @ Shyfer @ttrpg.network Posts 10Comments 1,035Joined 2 yr. ago
Damn you were right. Scrolled down a bit and they were all over. Did Hasbara finally find Lemmy, or had there been a new wave of propagandized redditors leaving to come here?
There's nowhere else for Hamas to set up. There's civilians in all of Gaza. It's an extremely densely populated region, even more so now that it's being cleared and destroyed. Second, Hamas was created in response to Israeli aggression that already existed. Surrendering would just bring them to the status quo that inspired the First Intifada, when Palestinians were still being attacked, killed, restricted, oppressed, and their land steadily taken for more than 20 years already. People don't respond well to that and to expect them to sit there and being slowly ethnically cleansed again is unrealistic. The correct take is to oppose Israel and it's settler colonialism.
Why is this post down voted so hard? Is it because it didn't have a link at first?
Quality content! I'd love to get more into LARP but coming up with an original character is difficult for me sometimes, and role playing for such long amounts of time seem tiring.
Dman that's a wizard-y wizard. Look at all those crystals!
It's too bad the Pathfinder instance.here on the fediverse isn't still alive. That would've been a great place to cultivate an alternative community outside of Reddit.
I'm guessing by this logic you're not voting for Biden, or don't support voting for him if you don't live in the US?
You have to imagine other people have no idea about Marxism but what they've heard from US propaganda. When they hear you support China, Cuba, and Vietnam, they just hear you supporting dictator for life Xi Jinping and one party state Cuba and Vietnam. You guys need better answers than this.
The other person's answer was pretty good, though.
There's hypothetically a bunch of different version of communism for everyone. The thing is, Marx described the problems with capitalism, and some vague sense of what socialism could be, some guidelines of what it should aim for, then kind of left the details up to each individual society to get there how they think is best based on their individual material conditions. He gave his own guesses, but didn't think he could predict that part fully, it would be up to the people of the future to figure it out and build on. A third world country, rural serf based near fuedal society, like Russia, would have completely different needs from some post-industrial country, like if Germany turned communist, for example. If the world's sole superpower, the US, turned communist, it would probably be a lot different than communist countries that had to transition under siege neighboring imperialism, like Cuba, North Korea, or Vietnam.
This is just to answer your last question. Don't think this really addresses your other questions, but just wanted to explain that part, as I've had it explained to me before. But I generally agree with you. There should still be some form of democracy but it might look different than what we are used to here in the US or liberal west.
Woah, crazy. So I should start listening to their other stuff besides that one song?
Ya thanks for the interesting POV. I'll try to look at it from that angle when I finally make it out over there.
I guess it's a combination of spamming plus one point of view. That still doesn't really strike me as bannable, as most people will post articles they agree with and hence want to share that way. As long as the posted articles are true, then the only issue I see is the spamming part, which is the only thing I agree could be an issue.
I'd definitely still love to see it one day. And now at least that won't catch me off guard lol.
It's hard to describe why, but you visit that kind of place to see the wonders of nature and all that. Still, I'll keep in mind that other person's comment about the great feat of engineering it required.
Thanks for answering anyway!
You should make spamming too many articles within a certain X time a rule then. I think it needs to be more objective. This is getting into partisan territory.
So the rule was spamming? They should make that an actual rule then instead of banning people for posting articles supporting their opinion.
Everyone who posts anything about Trump on this instance? You ever see a good post about Trump here? Or hell, China?
I had no idea. That is kinda disappointing lol
Nah it's just an excuse for where his character gets his cool toys.