Semester3383 @ Semester3383 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

95

Joined

1 mo. ago

Can you tell me which sentence in that statement clearly says, "I support sending weapons to Israel"? Or are you making a lot of inferences based on you a priori beliefs?

You're not proving your point.

Hope that helps.

You aren't making your case here.

It wouldn't have mattered how she voted on this bill to anyone that thinks she isn't far enough left, or left in the correct way, because that amendment wouldn't have eliminated all Israel weapons from the bill. As you know. Voted to stop sending some weapons to Israel? That's not enough, therefore she supports genocide. Didn't vote to stop sending some weapons to Israel? She supports genocide. It's 'heads I win, tails you lose'.

She knew that, in the end, the bill would get passed despite her nay vote.

Okay, she also knew that the amendment wouldn't get passed, so there's no harm in voting against it, right? You're applying two different standards of logic here. If you look at it through the lens of, "AOC wants to eliminate all military funding to Israel", then the votes are ideologically consistent; the first fails to meet the goal, so gets voted down, the second vote--the overall military appropriation--funds Israel, and so also gets voted down.

You're setting up an unfalsifiable argument, where there's no condition that would lead you to believe that she's opposed to the genocide in Palestine.

...Have you tried a leash? (On a hand, not a neck. For safety.)

IIRC, there have been a few car companies that claimed that the transmission didn't need service. Without service the transmissions would fail at about 100k miles; with service they would last 2-3x longer.

And what is your belief based on? What falsifiable evidence do you have that it's actually correct, factually true?

In other words, how do you know?

Because Jesus Christ rose from the dead. OP is a Christian and believes that.

Any evidence for that, aside from a book that doesn't cite sources? Look mate, I can believe that Harry Potter really defeated He Who Shall Not Be Named and saved the muggle world from his domination, but does that make it right? Would that be a positive thing to base all of my life on?

This is the same as a Christian telling an atheist that their gay relationship is wrong.

...And yet, they do that all the time, don't they? Not only that, but they try to pass laws preventing them from happening. Or to prevent trans people from accessing appropriate healthcare. Or to ensure that women don't have rights to their own bodies.

No, it doesn't matter to the universe. Morality can still matter to you. This is the idea that existentialism is built around: you have to make choices for yourself.

Given that the person claiming self defense can't have been the aggressor, maaaaaaaaaaaybe people shouldn't be threatening other people with serious bodily harm or death? I dunno, I'm just thinking that maybe those deaths prevented at least that many people from being seriously harmed in assaults?

Define "cheating".

I looked up an online answer key for the last test I took. The test was take-home and open book, and the teacher repeatedly said that we could use ANY resource to complete the test. I spent hours scouring the course material trying to find some of the answers, and they just weren't there; the course simply didn't cover some areas of the test at all. Or even mention them. It turned out that there were several version of the course that I took, and the teach taught one version, but used the test for a different version.

Is that "cheating"? I don't know. I did all the parts that I could without looking online, but I'm still not happy that I needed to look online in order to complete a course 'successfully'.

There's nothing particularly wrong with lust, sexual attraction, desire for connection, etc. It's all part of simply being human. Why would you assume that the teachings of the Christian bible are correct, not in just this matter, but any other? Why not any other scripture? Buddhists, for instance, would say that any desire prevents you from progressing spiritually. Satanists (me!) would say that no desire is inherently wrong, and that it's how the desire is expressed, and it's whether it overrides someone else's autonomy that makes a thing right or wrong.

I don't view paying a prostitute for sexual services as being inherently wrong. It's wrong if you've agreed to sexual fidelity with another person (terms and conditions apply), and it's wrong if you're using a prostitute that has been forced into sexual labor. But if you haven't promised a partner (or partners) that you will be sexually faithful to them, and the prostitute is in the field willingly--or, at least as willingly as anyone that works at any job--then it's not really any more wrong than, say, paying someone to make a meal for you when you're hungry. Labor is labor, regardless of the nature of the work.

The first step to overcoming this 'problem' is therapy. You want a sexual and emotional connection, and you feel like you're unable to find it otherwise. You should find a licensed psychotherapist--not a member of the clergy, not a life coach--and work on why you have problems finding that.

Why do you believe that it does?

Look mate, we're a cosmic blip. On the scale of the universe, we don't even register. We're born, we live, we die, and on the scale of how long the universe has existed, it's not even a blink. The universe is about 13,900,000,000 years old. The first single-cell organisms emerged about 3,500,000,000 years ago. Humans, in our current form, have only existed for a mere 300,000 years. Our sun will turn into a red giant in about 5,000,000,000 years, which will sterilize the surface of the earth, but it won't matter to humans, because we will have evolved into an entirely different species and almost certainly have gone completely extinct billions of years before that happens.

NOTHING we do matters to the universe. There is nothing we can do that will affect the course of the entire universe. Any belief to the contrary is simply terror management. So how could one moral code, in the grand scheme of the universe, matter more than any other?

What makes you believe, aside from your attempts to manage your terror of non-existence, that any of your morality matters at all?

Why do you assume that a god is necessary for morality? What led you to this conclusion? What falsifiable evidence do you have?

I know, right? How many of the people shitting on everyone right of Emma Goldman and Mikhail Bakunin ever did any real community organizing, volunteering, or political canvassing? How many have actively worked to push the Democratic party farther left, rather than just shitposting online about how awful Dems are? Sure, we all want (well, a lot of the people here, I suspect) want socialist candidates that are smart and tough on the ballot. But are we doing to work at a local level to get there? This shit doesn't happen overnight; you start work locally, work up to a state level, and then go national, once you've got that base of support.

Yeah, it's def. fed posting. Because you sure as fuck don't do that kind of organizing online.

Here's the thing: if you're going to be a real revolutionary militia, you really don't have a great way of organizing. Everything is going to have big risks. But encouraging people to commit crimes in a public forum, where every user name can be pretty easily traced back to a real person? Oh yeah, that's absolutely fed posting, whether they know it or not.

The only way it wouldn't be fed posting would be if this was a .onion site, and there was absolutely no verification of users. But then you're just kicking the can down the road; sure, it's safe to post stuff online then, but eventually you have to meet people IRL if you plan to do more than just talk, and that's when the feds are gonna getcha.

You should be doing transmission service regularly though. Automatic transmissions are often claimed to be good for the life of the car, but regular drain and flush will prolong the life. Coolant flushes used to be more necessary than they are now.

I've been wearing VFFs for, uh, fifteen years or so? Something like that? I think it might be a little more, I'm not sure now. I've also got a pair of VivoBarefoot hiking boots, and the Bellville MiniMil rough-out boots that end up being my utility shoes. The only times I don't wear minimalist footwear is on a bicycle (I used SPD pedals), and on a motorcycle (I have Sidi Vortice and Mag-1 boots). I always wear socks with my boots, and always Injinji socks with my VFFs.

I've gotten so used to them that regular shoes feel very weird and uncomfortable.

I believe that diatomaceous earth works on all insects. It's not poison; it's finely ground silica, and it essentially wrecks their insect lungs. It will also wreck your lungs if you aren't careful with it (silicosis is super-bad, m'kay?). The issue will be getting it where it needs to be to affect them, and you'll have to re-apply after rain.

I've had cats named Baldr, Hermóðr, Grendel, and Wotan. I've currently got a Valkyrie, Brynhildr, Freyja, and Freya (we got Freya when she was a year old because her owner couldn't keep her, and we already had Frejya, so...). But our current boy cats are Svartur ('cuz he's black), Robert, and Charlie.

Yeah, but a lot of insurance plans also have coverage maximums.