Hagdos @ Hagdos @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

223

Joined

2 yr. ago

I have a good gaming PC in my living room. Still I find myself on the couch with my steam deck very often.

That's blatantly untrue. My plant ID app gives multiple suggestions with certainty percentages.

A

Nice little game, thanks for sharing!

Decipher #10 deciphered in ⏱️ 3m 1s ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ https://decipher.wtf

but self driving cars are immensely dangerous, and there's no evidence that self driving cars will make roads safer.

This is a horrible take, and absolutely not true. Maybe for the current state of technology, but not as an always-true statement.

Humans are horrible at driving. It's not hard to be better at driving than the average human. Perfect doesn't exist, and computer-driven cars will always make some mistakes, but so do humans (and media will report on self-driving cars much more than on the thousands of vehicle deaths caused by human error). AEB and other technologies have already made cars much safer over the previous decades.

On top of this, I have no confidence that the odds of an error in the system (eg: a dirty sensor, software getting confused) is not higher than the odds of a system correctly braking when it needs to.

Tell me you've never used or tested AEB without telling me.

Dirty sensors trigger a "dirty sensor warning", not a full emergency brake. There's more than one sensor, and it doesn't emergency brake on one bad sensor reading. Again, perfect doesn't exist, but it isn't close to the 50/50 you're trying to portray here.

• Car brakes hard (even at 90mph), perhaps losing traction depending on road conditions

Any car with AEB will also have ABS and traction control, so losing traction is unlikely. Being rear-ended is never on the liability of the front car.

Yes, cars are dangerous, yes we need to make them safer, but we should use better policies like slower speeds, safer roads, and transitioning to smaller lighter weight cars,

Absolutely agree on all of this. Slower speeds and safer roads make accidents less likely and less lethal, for human and computer drivers both.

As such, legislation should be pushing very hard to stop self driving cars.

Legislation should push hard for setting clear boundaries on when self-driving is good enough to be allowed on the road, and where the legal responsibilities are in case of problems. Just completely stopping it would be wasted potential for safer roads for everyone in the long run.

I agree, I just really want to insert my non-relevant ideas into the discussion

In position 91, behind 12 (zwölf) and all the decimal-2s (zwei-und-zwanzig etc)

Yeah, but that's a whole 'nother topic.

I live in a country with proper driving tests, but most drivers (myself included) are still shit at driving. Even professional bus drivers are limited humans.

A car nudging you towards an accident is dangerous, even if it's not forcing you into an accident.

An unnecessary distraction that needs active attention in a chaotic situation is a bad thing, bad driver or not. And yeah, there are many bad drivers out there. Cars should be designed to be driven by bad drivers, not armchair experts.

The BMW i8 has exactly this, a large subwoofer in the rear to make it sound like a heavy engine, even though it's electric.

The emails were mass reported, up to the point there was an internal message sent around to stop reporting them because they are legitimate. Of course, no action was taken to make them look less suspicious.

If I'd ever want to phish someone at my company, I'd know exactly what to do. Make the email look exactly like the training ones.

My company started with mandatory cybersecurity trainings for all employees. The training tool sends out automated emails to remind you when you have to do a new part of the training.

These emails, from a cybersecurity course, followed all the rules of being a phishing email:

• Sent from a non-company server
• Had a big red button to click here
• Urged you to take action ("You have 5 days to complete your training")

IT decided to fix that, by adding a line to the emails that this email is really from our company. Like a phisher wouldn't think of saying "nah, trust me bro, I'm totally legit"

That makes 0 latency in the monitor, but how much latency is there in the drivers that convert a digital image to analogue signals? Isn't the latency just moved to the PC side?

Yes, but not because of the oil. Pipes often clog due to a buildup of soap. Don't use more soap than you need, which for most people is about 10 times less than what they use now.

You could try, but authorities will absolutely try to stop you, similar to boat guy here. It's just that stopping a base diver is a little harder.

That's not an excuse to just skip all punctuation.

Not what you asked, but what you need to hear instead.

Sure, it's easier not to confront any of your problems, and act like 100kg is still "skinny fat" somehow. But wallowing in self-pity isn't going to make anything better, and it's the worst for your social life, which in turn is the worst for your mental health.

I don't expect you'll hear this either, and that's okay. I hope you find your way out of your misery at some point.

Yes, that's why I said "as long as you pick the right ones"

Nothing wrong with very general rules, as long as you pick the right ones.

Don't bully people. Don't be an asshole. Don't use or threaten with violence. Etc.

Even better are general positive rules: Be nice to other people. Be kind. Give constructive feedback. Etc.

Backing up "word is" by an article that says "word is" is kinda meager though. There are many things widely believed to be true that are not, or only mildly so our in specific circumstances.