FreedomAdvocate @ FreedomAdvocate @lemmy.net.au

Oh hi there *person who I've upset by expressing my opinion who is now want

---

Read more

Posts

3

Comments

1,485

Joined

3 mo. ago

Moderating

---

No, but the closest I've ever gotten to it was Steve Irwin. I had the pleasure of meeting him a few times and he was just the most genuine, caring guy you could ever meet. His entire being was dedicated to making the world a better place.

You've got zero evidence of that lol. Their algorithm is open source btw.

I use a Logitech MX Master 3 as my mouse and it's fantastic, would highly recommend.

They specifically say they can not decrypt your messages.

Why does everyone in here think that E2E encryption is some insanely hard new thing? It's been "solved" for years lol. It's not hard to do.

You don't just log in to their new chat with a 4 digit pass key lol. You need to be logged in to X, meaning password and (hopefully) 2FA would need to be "hacked" in order to even get to the 4 digit password.

Rules were put in place to stop trackers like that as they are massive security risks, borderline doxing.

From the sidebar:

Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

Was I uncivil in what I said? You're definitely being uncivil. I'm not "super right wing" and I'm definitely not "trolling". I'm here for a discussion, clearly unlike you.

The phrasing is only stupid if you are trying to have an issue with it. Obviously you and the person you're chatting to can read your messages. That doesn't need to be said, it's inferred.

End to End Encryption is easy. Why do you guys all seem to think it's hard?

Most recently, the new DOGE has suffered substantial security lapses,

Did they? What? The made up ones where people claimed that DOGE gave russian hackers access to databases despite DOGE never even requesting access to their systems?

Even before Twitter was aquired, Twitter had an embarrassing memorable history with public figures suffering from security incidents caused by Twitter’s own staff, training, technology or processes.

Funny that you say this after you said this:

Musk routinely hires young unqualified technicians, and abused, laid off, or otherwise alienated much of the top talent at Twitter, in the name of cost savings.

So twitters staff, training, technology and processes were the source of these embarrassing incidents.......but then Musk shouldn't have gotten rid of them?

but could be disasterous for anyone relying on this new E2EE solution, if it is incorrectly implemented.

And there's nothing to say that it is incorrectly implemented other than hopes and dreams by people who want it to be.

The talent needed to correctly implement secure end to end encryption is rare, on a good day, for a good employer with a strong history of loyalty to their staff.

Absolutely not true lol. Secure end to end encryption is a solved problem. It's not hard to implement.

Are you? Because X is the only platform that's legally fighting against government ordered censorship. X is the only social media platform that pretty much only bans you if you break the law, instead of banning you the second you question the echo chambers preferred message.

It's strange how people who hate capitalism and rich people love Greta, a millionaire who inherited extreme wealth and has never had to work a day in her life.

That’s a 4 digits password behind your account password and 2FA lol.

How did you get that from what I said?

If you don’t trust it you can still read the emails. If you do, you don’t have to read the emails. If want to confirm what it does say a few times until you can decide if you trust it or not, you can do that.

Google “read” your emails and feed them into their AI regardless, always have. They don’t need your “consent” to add features or make UI changes.

I’m assuming you actually mean it should’ve been off by default?

I literally just showed you why studies shouldn’t just be trusted, and you come back with this?

It’s becoming quite evident why you won’t answer about your education level.

What are you basing your doubts on? When has X under Musk had anything happen to doubt their encryption? You think the guy fighting for free speech and ending people getting in trouble for what they say is going to lie about this?

I think a summary of an email is going to be right more like 9.5/10 times.

The guy who champions free speech?

If only you could still see the actual emails…..

Oh wait, you can!

Lack of consent for what?