FreedomAdvocate @ FreedomAdvocate @lemmy.net.au Posts 0Comments 54Joined 6 days ago
Where's the crackdown on free speech by "MAGA" there?
Not an expert then, gotcha.
Cool, and do you know that the ones that this new process is going to use aren't mental health professionals? The change is specifically so untrained police officers with guns aren't being sent in to mental health emergencies because they acknowledge that they are not what is needed.
Ok so it's not manufactured by the government or anything, it's just rich people manipulating markets like they always do and always will?
Well you definitely must be right because you pulled out all the "phobic" terms to shout about.
Cool, so you found what.....6 people who might possibly be gay or like some strange stuff? And that then means that all "right-wingers" are the same? So if I was to find say 6 instances of a left-winger being a pedo, does that mean that all left-wingers are pedos?
So fine with some murderers, not fine with others, just depends on the politics in play?
And by "bad people" you mean everyone who supports a political party that you don't?
They are going to be mental health professionals, that’s the point. They’re not going to be “cops with a little training”.
So you’re an expert on it I assume? What qualifications did you have to get to have that title?
So do I, but that’s not the world we live in and it’s not helpful to say that your utopia society ways are reasons why this isn’t better than what we currently have.
It seems to be a common left-winger fantasy that right-wingers are secretly obsessed with gays/trans/femboys/queer/etc sexually. Doesn't seem to be based on any truth, just your typical left/right wing rubbish.
What am I claiming to be an expert on?
Ok so your entire argument hinges on the complete overhaul of society. Gotcha. I'm out.
There are no mental health professionals that arrive on the scene. It could be EMT, firefighters, or police that initiate contact. None of the above are mental health professionals.
THIS IS PART OF THE CHANGES THAT THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE lol.
I didn’t suggest that people are locked up for “simply for missing their rent”. Never once did I suggest people are locked up permanently.
Ah youre right, sorry that's the other delusional person in here making the same arguments as you.
A first responder is dispatched and kidnaps them.
This right here is why this is going nowhere. What you think happens and what actually happens are two very different things. This should have been apparent that it was not worth my time when you suggested that people would be locked up in a mental institution permanently simply for missing their rent.
A first responder is not a psychiatrist or able to diagnose somebody in such an environment.
And this new thing that you're arguing in a comments section about aims to change that. This will change the first responders to being unarmed mental health professionals instead of armed police.
I’ve answered this in abundance. Re-read.
Ok cool so your solution is for the entire world to change to be something completely different, and for their mental illness to be just gone. In other words, it's not a solution and you have no actual solution or answer to my question. Not all mental illness is caused by the environment around the person. Most of it isn't.
So I'll ask again but even more narrow in scope - what do you suggest the government do, with society and the world the way it is, with people that are severely mentally ill and homeless who refuse all help?
During a manufactured housing crisis that is only getting worse though…
I'll admit I don't know enough about the NY housing market to comment on this - what do you mean by this?
What if it was hearsay? What if they got the wrong person?
You do understand that the police don't just turn up and throw any accused into the back of the paddy wagon and take them to jail, don't you?
The state of New York could buy these homes and use them to re-home individuals placed into them or repurpose them.
Sure, if the people that own them wanted to sell them.
Or build new, affordable housing.
But many of these people couldn't afford "affordable housing", so it would need to be free. Food would need to be free, electricity would need to be free, water, internet, etc would all need to be free (for them, but paid for by taxpayers). Also where is the new affordable housing being built, and who is paying for it?
Are you seriously arguing for renting and no social safety net?
Huh? The point was that using YOUR scenario, people could easily abuse the system to simply get free housing/food/etc by missing a rent payment and getting taken away and given a free house/food/etc.