Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DR
Posts
2
Comments
77
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I'm not saying none of this is true, but at the very least most of this is misleading. We're figuring out how to recycle old solar panels on an industrial scale: https://youtu.be/FCtEWveySsA

    But progress is a bit slower than expected, mostly also because panels are a lot longer-lived than previously assumed (this is a good thing).

    Yes, panels use rare minerals, but so does basically everything we consume and use nowadays. There's two answers to that.

    A) does it still make sense climate-wise to use these resources in solar panels? This is what Life Cycle Analyses are for. In general, throughout their life cycle, PV modules help prevent more CO2 emissions than their manufacturing process releases, i.e. they are a net gain (https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/1/252). This is similar to EV vehicles, which break even around 60k km driven depending on your electricity generation (if memory serves https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2023/733112/IPOL_STU(2023)733112_EN.pdf)

    b) is there a way to manufacture PV panels less resource-intensive and maybe even without relying on (Chinese) rare earth minerals as much? Yes there is. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/publications/studies/ISE-Sustainable-PV-Manufacturing-in-Europe.pdf and see also sources above for next-gen differences.

    That being said, for now it's still economically more attractive (usually) to implement Chinese panels because they're flooding the market. Still, it's a net gain as outlined.

  • thanks! I'm no mathematician and won't pretend to understand what's going on there, but I've stumbled across some "This knowledge is too much for a human brain to hold and therefore I have gone mad" tropes (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GoMadFromTheRevelation) that I was always wondering if there are actual IRL examples of this

  • no matter. I know that Career foundry offers (used to offer?) a "pay after" scheme for some of their certifications. So it doesn't cost you anything up front, but you set up a contract where you'd pay them like 5-10% of your new job's wages for a set time.

    https://careerfoundry.com/en/courses/become-a-ux-designer/

  • Please don't! Do you qualify for state-sponsored training? I know some people who have really improved their situation by taking advantage of the courses the unemployment office offers.

  • Doesn't Austria have a law that allows employees to reduce hours to part-time as they see fit? We do here in Germany. Last place I worked at, my team lead didn't want me to reduce from full-time to 80%. The Betriebsrat (employee council) was ready to go to bat for me, but I didn't like the role anyway, so I interviewed for another place. They offered me 80%, a pay raise, a better role and benefits.

    This might come off as bragging, I realize. Sorry, not my intention. I just wanted to share my experience, maybe it's useful to someone 😊

  • Reminder: none of the currently available methods of cloud seeding are proven to work.

    https://www.wired.com/story/new-gods-weather-rain-cloud-seeding-emirates/

    Yes, it all works in theory and in the lab, but in practice we have no idea if cloud seeding "makes it rain" or if it would have rained anyway (to make a long story very short).

    So take anything anyone says about "them making it rain" with, like, two grains of salt.

  • Diese Steine sind schon mal ein guter Anfang, genauso wie der Horl. Richtig geil scharf (also so dass ich mich damit rasieren kann) würden meine Messer aber erst mit der richtigen Technik und Abziehledern. Und da gibt's kaum was gscheiteres als das Vierkant-Werkzeug von Schmiedeglut IMHO. Preislich zwischen den Billigsteinen von Amazon und dem Horl.

    Unbedingt die Videos zur Bedienung des Herstellers auf YT gucken (auch wenn mir der Typ auf'n Sack geht) und ein paar von Outdoors55 zur fundierteren Ergänzung.

  • I feel like there's two stories here:

    1. Snap is a pedo grooming ground
    2. Police are generating fake CSAM
    3. is, well, yeah . Like any major network you have creeps, Nazis and pedos and it's good to root them out. It's weird that themselves don't do that.
    4. is ... difficult. I feel like the cops that prompt GenAIs to produce (sexualized) images of children risk severe trauma. It must be punishing to ask a a machine to produce fake images of morally reprehensible material. That's gotta take a toll on you. What's even more important is that those people could be spending their time taking down actual child abuse images.

    I can't wrap my head around that.