I'm pretty sure they're correct. 0.26 per cent is 2.6 per mille (thousand).
That's a fair concern. I think it could be fixed by asking workers about food allergies and avoiding those foods. Unless it's an absolutely massive company it should be feasible.
Except the proposed rule doesn't do that. It's only regarding carriers unlocking policies. The owner of the phone could still be under contact, and early termination fees would still apply. Carriers are still able to recoup any losses on the hardware through those fees. Requiring phones to be unlocked after 60 days changes none of that.
As things are now, a poor person would have to pay BOTH. An early termination fee AND then go buy a new phone if they wanted to switch to a new carrier before the (typically 2 year) contact is complete. They lose any money they've put into their current phone because it's locked to a carrier until they have been in good standing for the full 2 years.
So what it really depends on is if you think a poor person should be trapped with their current carrier until they finish the contract, unlock the phone and move to another, OR if they should be free to switch over to the competition at any time without onerous restrictions on hardware they have fully paid for via early termination fees.
Yeah, NAT is great for home users. Unless your ISP is also using (carrier grade) NAT. Then you're fucked by double NAT and have to call your ISP every time you want to forward a port.
This argument may have made sense a decade ago, but phones today aren't making the generational leaps and bounds with performance every year. Even the low end phones are just fine for most uses these days.
If you're poor, and I certainly have been, you shouldn't get into these contacts that ultimately cost you more. You buy a cheap phone from last year and put it on an MVNO that's cheap
Honestly the OG stream controller would have been perfect if they could find a way to fit a 2nd analog stick on there
Exactly! Just grip the cardboard tube and pull the middle out
THERE'S SECRET GOLD IN THEM THAR SPHINX!
If they're able to siphon money from the public school system they'll look better compared to the now poorer public school.
She's saying the states don't have standing to bring the suit. They're unable to prove they were harmed specifically, so they don't have standing.
A better way to read the phrase in question would be "the court's doctrine regarding standing"
See: Standing
Bessie says it adds a certain umami flavor to her hay
Same here. I heard they released a handful of new upper tier pals but I'll wait for the next major revision to go back
I'm kinda surprised that insurance companies haven't offered to buy driver information from these types of companies so they can raise rates
It's a shame passenger pigeon nets have fallen out of style. I imagine you could catch a lot of ducks with one of those
Most manufacturers have these types of systems but none are up to the new standard. They're often called forward collision warning/avoidance systems.
Some cars aren't quite that simple, on newer models they're hiding the keyhole on the bottom side of the handle behind a cover. But usually those models won't lock with the keys inside the car
That's what I thought it looked like, but it's on a street light, not at an intersection