![CascadeOfLight [he/him]](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/4be38b64-63e3-40a3-8581-0ec11349c485.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
TRUE communism!
Oh, so you care about bourgeoise multiparty elections for control of a state? Which is it, are all states evil or are some actually okay, now that you think about it? Perhaps the ones you live in and have assimilated all the cultural norms of? What a curious coincidence.
Ah yeah, I forgot the anarchist counter to communist arguments, not being able to read.
Here's some pretty pictures for you to look at - Chinese life expectancy
and Chinese solar panel production
If the human species still exists in a thousand years, it will be thanks to the communists of China
didnt they fight the boers at one point
That's true and good, but even then, in the process they also invented the concept of the concentration camp. I mean, rounding up civilians into cramped, unsanitary conditions with little food so that they all die of disease is a pretty obvious idea, but they systematized and came up with the euphemism for it.
And US republicans say they believe in freedom above all.
Nonsequitur, of course everyone says they believe in freedom, including you, the difference is whether their actions lead to it, which the Communist Party of China's have done.
I figured it would be this story, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't some other phantasm you'd conjured up. Pornography is illegal in China (as it should be). These women were writing erotic novels that crossed the legal boundary into pornography, however that's judged, and selling them. There is a thriving market for gay erotica that skirts the pornography law, and a thriving scene for 'pornographic' novels that aren't being sold for money, the problem is when you try to secretly sell the latter. As a result, 22 people have been arrested for essentially tax fraud, out of a population of 1,400,000,000.
And why would China be anti-LGBT? Like most of the third world, China has some cultural conservatives with anti-LGBT views, but also like in most of the third world, these were installed by colonizers forcing westernization and Christian morality upon them. China has a long history of LGBT acceptance and even celebration in its pre-modern history, such as the 'passion of the cut sleeve' (go look it up). The crucial difference is that unlike in the western world, they don't have a massive, powerful, fundamentalist religious lobby that can dictate policy and force them back in the wrong direction. The Chinese youth are unsurprisingly more progressive than their elders, so as time goes on attitudes should soften more.
But this brings up another important point: without a state, what are you going to do with all the homophobes? Do you think you could have a peaceful anarchist revolution in the United States and everyone would just stop hating gay and transgender people by themselves? Do you think the reactionaries of the US won't need to be imprisoned until they can be educated into not hating the gays? Do you think you won't need a special body of armed men to forcibly suppress the urge to lynch which lives in the heart of a large fraction of USians? What is the anarchist mechanism for actually transforming the world as it is now, into the world we want it to be, without apparently inconveniencing anyone? You can't answer this of course, because anyone who thinks about it long enough and actually references history becomes a communist.
Me when I'm an anarchist who cares about state gold reserves.
Anyway, it was payment for the
- 242 aircraft,
- 703 pieces of artillery,
- 731 tanks,
- 1,386 trucks,
- 300 armored cars
- 15,000 heavy machine guns,
- 500,000 rifles,
- 30,000 sub-machine guns,
- 4,000,000 artillery shells,
- 1,000,000,000 machine gun cartridges,
- over 69,000 tons of war material, and
- over 29,000 tons of ammunition
That the USSR provided. Should they have given it for free? Should they have not given support at all? Would it have been better for the Republicans to just accept they were going to lose anyway and die with their gold? Would you prefer that gold to have been captured by the Fascists?
Besides, the actual greatest gold heist of the century was during Indian independence, when their entire gold reserves were airlifted to the UK in exchange for... nothing. Which I'm sure you knew about, having devoted a proportional amount of your time to looking into the actual crimes of capitalist nations as you have the fictional crimes of socialist ones.
It's colonialism when you teach peasants how to read and give them telegraph poles and combine harvesters. You are a fucking stupid historically illiterate imperial core roleplayer piece of shit, the USSR was the first anticolonial nation in history, they fought on the morally correct side of nearly every anticolonial struggle in the world in the 20th century. As just even a single example, in 1961, the USSR used its veto powers in the UN to stop a forced ceasefire, allowing the Indians to invade and liberate the Portugese-held island of Goa, literally kicking out colonialists.
But it's interesting that you seem to agree with the representative of Portugal that the USSR has 'shamed the whole of mankind'.
The USSR created the first artifical satellite, put the first man in space, put the first woman in space, conducted the first spacewalk, landed the first spacecraft on the moon, landed the first spacecraft on another planet (Venus), built the first space station and landed the first spacecraft on Mars. The first black man in space was an Afro-Cuban man who went on in a Soviet rocket. Eight of the first ten nationalities in space were from the 'eastern block'. 'Astronaut Barbie' was released by Mattel two years after the first Soviet woman went to space, and twenty years BEFORE the first US woman would.
Anyway I'm tired of reading your overwrought self-righteous self-important reddit liberal style of argumentation, all form and no substance, so just feel free to go read a book (assuming that's something you're actually capable of) and argue with that instead.
Chinese people both feel that their country is more democratic, and that democracy is more important, than every other country in the world.
They said while “AES“ China is massively oppressing it's LGBT populace from expressing LGBT ideas.
What the fuck are you talking about?? When you make a claim you have to back it up with evidence. It is obviously much, much safer to be LGBT in China than in most other countries in the world, ESPECIALLY the US - and if you want the most progressive legislation on LGBT rights, womens rights and the rights of children then you have to go to the communist state of Cuba.
Ah, of course, I forgot that protesting against claims that are false is exactly the same as protesting against claims that are true, you're so balanced and wise. Saying that the Holocaust didn't happen and saying that Stalin didn't actually personally eat all of the corn in Ukraine with a giant spoon are exactly morally equivalent. If you would like to provide any evidence for a single one of your "irrefutable claims" I would love to see it.
Damn, I didn't know you could bluff the Wehrmacht with fake industrial output. Who knew you could just lie about how much steel you were producing and simply will more divisions of tanks into existence?
Also, more importantly than that, what the fuck are you talking about? Do you have a single shred of evidence to back up that claim? In fact, do you have a single shred of evidence to back up ANY of your claims? I've never even heard a claim like that before. Did you just make it up off the cuff? Do you care about evidence? Do you read books? Have you even the slightest singlest iota of interest in the actual factual history of the world, or are you just a larper who prefers a particular set of drapery on the society they idly daydream about?
I care because these were people who actually lived and fought and bled for a better world and I will not have some imperial core shitstain besmirching their name by drooling out the cheapest CIA propaganda ever produced. Are you stupid? What do you think living inside a successful propaganda campaign would look like? Have you ever considered why your opinions align exactly with the interests of the US State Department? Go and read Blackshirts and Reds by Michael Parenti, it's short and you'll learn something.
Oh shit yeah, I forgot about all that bullshit the CIA made up.
Wait a second, THOUGHT CRIMES???? THOUGH CRIMES??????? Do you think 'Thought Crimes' were a real thing that existed outside of the anticommunist screed '1984'?
Anyways, on to your next point, oh, it's the most unreasonable fucking false equivalency I've ever seen in my life. The UK is not and has never been a democracy, it is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie that has occasional political pageantry where it pretends the people have any power at all, just like every single nation that is not communist. Fighting the Nazis is the literal only time the British Empire did a single good thing, and their problem with German fascism was the German part, not the fascism part. And then they immediately started drawing up 'Operation Unthinkable', the plan to resume an invasion of the USSR using mainly Wehrmacht soldiers, a plan I assume you support wholeheartedly as it would have destroyed what was obviously the most evil nation in the world at the time, the one whose soldiers liberated Auschwitz.
Why would there need to be an alternative? It was already the best possible version of what could have happened, within the bounds of a crushing siege by the entire capitalist world on one hand, and basic human fallibility on the other. There is no other political leader in history with a higher proportion of correct decisions to mistakes than Stalin, and they were mistakes, as in consequences not intended from actions taken earnestly to protect the people of the USSR - unlike the actual unspeakable atrocities being committed constantly by every single imperialist nation at the time, as well as before and since.
Even just on its own terms, the USSR was unimaginably more humane than what came before:
what existed outside of it:
and what came after:
This is called the "Eastern Cross" by the way, a demographic phenomenon unique to former nations of the USSR, where the death rate and birth rate suddenly cross over each other in the 90s. It's way better that this happened, of course, than the USSR being run by """authoritarians""" who would protect their people from sabotage and murder using the necessary amount of violence (that is, still less than their enemies).
But I forgot, we're comparing an actual nation that had to actually exist in the dirt and blood of the real world, to the geometrically perfect platonic anarchist society that lives in your head, so I guess I have to concede. I'll go tell all the communists in the third world to pack it up and disband their organizations and scratch out all the hammers and sickles so you can go tell them how to avoid being assassinated by the CIA the right way.
You're so right, it would have been way better for everyone in the territory of the USSR to be illiterate and poor and starving, so they wouldn't have cared so much when the Nazis effortlessly murdered everyone from western Poland to eastern Siberia. Who even needs industrial output when you could have a """horizontally-organized""" bandit kingdom named after its unelected leader?
I would expect someone trying to criticize something to have the most basic familiarity with it, yes.
reads a history book
Oh I see, they're called 'tankies' because the USSR gave 731 tanks to the Republicans, being the only nation to provide them any material support
It was literally the fastest growing economic system of all time. It went from wooden hand-drawn plows to spaceflight in a single generation, while defeating the most devastating invasion in human history. The nation once called "the India of Europe" became the first interplanetary civilization.
Then, after the entire collective might of the capitalist world had slaughtered dozens of millions of the bravest and most committed communists, it started falling apart because liberals took over. It was dissolved illegally, against the wishes of 70% of the population that voted in a referendum to keep the Union, in a bloody coup that killed over 2000 people fighting against its destruction. By the end of the 90s there had been 7-10 million excess deaths above the death rate of the 80s in Russia alone, making it one of the worst non-war human-caused humanitarian disasters of all time.
In short, the people of the USSR were revolutionaries and heroes, whereas you are a grotty little chauvinist from the imperial core who doesn't want to improve the world, because if you did you would want to win, and if you wanted to win you would read history, and if you read history you would come to the same conclusion.
Yemen: US Air Strike that has Left Dozens of Migrants Dead Must Be Investigated
Ah good, that accounts for 1 out of the 33 articles about Yemen written since the US and Israel started indiscriminately bombing the country for daring to act against their genocide of Palestine, the rest of which are criticizing "the Huthi de facto authorities" (i.e. the legitimate government of Yemen) for various perceived infractions.
And of course, the headline is not about any of the strikes on residential apartment blocks or civilian airports or seaports, but about hitting a migrant detention facility, so that the article can go on to spend half its length complaining about "the Huthi de facto authorities" and their detainment of migrants, their 'restrictions on independent investigation', and their 'crackdown on civic spaces'.
The takeaway of the article, which pervades its entire language and tone, is that the US military needs to more carefully select and investigate its targets when bombing foreign countries, so that they only kill and destroy 'legitimate military targets' and don't accidentally harm the poor innocents who these tyrannical foreign brutes are already terrorizing, implicitly suggesting the US is somehow a thoughtful moral actor that gives even a single fuck about killing civilians, and that its enemies do actually deserve to be murdered but only in the right way with cleaner, more nuanced weaponry.
If you want them to write more reports, consider supporting them, instead of complaining.
They get all the support they need from the NED and CIA, what I want is for them to write NO reports so I never have to see another mealy-mouthed, wounded innocence "speaking truth to power" shitsmear of lies and insinuations against whoever dares to resist the will of the US State Department, when the overwhelming majority of human rights violations in the world today are very very clearly committed by the US Empire and its global proxy forces.
The analysis found that of the 78 concluded cases under the NSL at least 66 (84.6%) involved legitimate expression that should not have been criminalized according to international standards
These cases fall well short of the high threshold required for criminalization under international standards.
These people were wrongly criminalized! According to their country's laws? Well no, according to totally undefined """international standards""". Are we going to apply those standards to, for instance, checking whether people imprisoned in the US are 'wrongly criminalized'? Of course not.
After checking the most recent ten pages of articles, out of 120 entries there were five about the US, not a single one of which had anything to do with the indiscriminate mass arrests of immigrants. There are as many unique news stories about the new law in Georgia requiring foreign NGOs to disclose their sources of funding, as there are about the US in total. If you search 'ICE', there is one (1) article that mentions it in the headline, which when sorted by 'Most Relevant' is the NINTH article to appear, and which is complaining about the National Guard mobilization against the protests against ICE, not even ICE itself.
"Amnesty International" is an attack dog of the US State Department that has no purpose but to generate headlines bashing the enemies of the Empire, with the very occasional half-hearted jab at the most obviously inexcusable crimes of the US and Europe to maintain their cover as some sort of impartial third-party. On their 'Take Action' page, "Join the fight for freedom [sic] in Hong Kong" is displayed before "Lift the blockade on Gaza and stop the genocide", which should tell you everything you need to know about their priorities.
Coincidentally, its maximum accurate range and its penetration depth are about the same distance
What are you talking about?? The baseline of this site is Let's Go Bomb Tel Aviv. I don't think I've ever seen a single person say that Israel should exist in any form whatsoever.
And the withdrawal of US support, if that can even happen without a total US imperial collapse, would be the most significant step towards that happening. You seem to have an idealistic assumption that somehow the Israelis could just will themselves into being able to fight through their fanaticism, but you can't will bombs, missiles and interceptors into existence. Only the US can supply Israel with those at the volume they need, and withdrawal of the US would basically end Israeli material capacity to defend themselves from Iran, and shortly after that the ability to fight at all.
Oh, so Israelis are not allowed to leave? They're not allowed to travel freely but are confined to one place? Like some sort of... hostages?
Thanks, and to add even further, this had global effects too
High living standards and strong workers' rights and compensation in the USSR forced capitalist nations around the world to make concessions to their workers. Once the USSR had been destroyed, the concessions could be rolled back and the profits guzzled by the capitalists.