You're viewing part of a thread.
plainly, I'd say it's state repression. they struck fear in their hearts in the state struck back.
1 1 ReplyThat's incredibly unspecific, repression is one of the main things states do and is a broad category.
2 0 Replythey were hunted down and framed for crimes. they were executed. they were exiled.
1 1 ReplyI feel like they probably shouldn't have done those things then, if they weren't able to sustain themselves in the face of that sort of state repression like communists could.
2 0 ReplyI know you disagree with anarchist tactics. That's what our whole discussion is about.
1 1 ReplyDo you not also disagree with those tactics, given how spectacularly they've failed to amount to anything material?
2 0 Replyno. I think they could have won 100 years ago and I think they could win tomorrow. I like the tactic. people can be inspired and it can happen in an instant.
1 1 ReplyI think they could have won 100 years ago
And yet they didn't
and I think they could win tomorrow.
And yet they won't.
1 0 Replythis is just posturing.
1 1 Reply"acknowledgeing material reality is posturing"
Man, your while ideology is just posturing.
1 0 Replyyou don't know the future anymore than I. you don't know what the next revolution will look like or what would start it.
1 1 Reply