It's penis. He means penis. Like, probably the length and girth of his penis. No one ever mentions penis color or how hairy it is (those are Jeep guys), just always the size.
I eent to buy a jeep last year and the dealer said he had to inspect my shaft and pubes before he'd let me on the lot. Didn't wind up buying one, the market adjustments were outrageous!
Sigh. Look, if you've never been to a jeep consortium, that's just how it goes. Hairy things flopping all over, kindof like a rave with more roll bars. I never want to see that much pubic hair again in my life.
And potentially family. It's a 4 door truck. It's a transportation vehicle with a bed and slightly greater towing capacity than a sedan. Lot of suburban dads have these.
I'm a tiny-truck-lover, and want one badly, but my family's big 'murica truck is waaaay more comfortable than my current sedan :(
Unrelated, but do tiny work trucks come with Bluetooth now?
Damn I hated riding in the back of my dad's Silverado. I'm almost 6ft and I can comfortably fit behind myself in the back seat of my impreza. The new Maverick looks like a pretty cool small truck option
In this case it’s not about body shaming but about shaming a means of compensation. Also it’s not really a literal take. “Big dick energy” has nothing do with actual dick size. And being a “Karen” has nothing to with a persons actual name or gender.
Neither is trashing the climate with pointlessly big vehicles just to compensate for whatever insecurities they have. We need to either tax or regulate these stupid vehicles back to a reasonable and safe size.
Not sure if you're serious but i will answer as if you were.
A common attack against people with large trucks is that they have a large truck to compensate having a small penis. This implies having a small penis is bad/unacceptable. This is obvious body shaming but also contributes to toxic masculinity.
Both of these are unacceptable.
There are many alternative ways to talk shit without playing into these kinds of comments and TBH, the compensation comments have been used so much and are so obviously baseless that they don't hit very hard, IMO.
well, i didn't actually say that, and i'm not responsible for others filling in the blanks with their own negative thoughts. as you can see, several others actually managed to conclude something different.
don't blame the Rorschach test because you see something you don't like.
you're projecting your own insecurities onto me and making yourself angry over something you imagined. I a not to blame for things your imagination does.
work out your problems with a professional, not by attacking random internet strangers.
Listen, you said what you said. Own up to it and learn, or don't and move on. But you really don't have to sit there and dig yourself even more into the shit. You sound silly.
Better to get the one that's specifically designed to kill toddlers then. If children have to die so you can be less scared of a "mash up" then it's all worth it.
Typical "Everyone drives a big truck so I will too!" mindset that misses the core issue on why kei trucks are the better ones. You simply can't imagine a world where the Ford Death Cruiser 4 billion doesn't exist.
Japan, the country that invented kei cars, also has larger cars. You're not looking at the same chance as running into a hummer, but crashing a kei car into a white plate out here still doesn't look good for the kei.
Sure, but they're not banned from highways. It's not uncommon to see them, although you're right about lower speed limits-- a lot of highways are about 80 km max