2y ago

Spotify will end service in Uruguay due to bill requiring fair pay for artists

Spotify will end service in Uruguay due to bill requiring fair pay for artists:: The Uruguayan Parliament approved an amendment to the country's copyright law last month

Technology @lemmy.zip

BrikoX @lemmy.zip

2y ago

mixmag.net /read/spotify-end-service-uruguay-copyright-law-change-artists-fair-pay-amendment-news

Hacker News @derp.foo

haxor @derp.foo

BOT

2y ago

Spotify Will End Service in Uruguay Due to Bill Requiring Fair Pay for Artists

mixmag.net /read/spotify-end-service-uruguay-copyright-law-change-artists-fair-pay-amendment-news

55 comments

After reading the whole article, I still don't know what Uruguay wants to happen.
- Found an earlier article by El Observador before the legislation passed. Under Uruguay's old laws Spotify, YouTube, an other streaming platforms paid little to nothing in artist royalties. With the new legislation artists will now see fair compensation.
  The Guardian does a better job explaining Spotify's problem: do the royalties come from rights holders (I am assuming they're referring to record labels) or the streaming services? The later case they believe will cause them to pay double what they're paying for streaming rights.
  The issue just needs to back to Uruguay's government to sort out who pays the artist royalties, or if both labels and streaming share a proportionate responsibility.
  
  Thanks.
  Putting the El Observador article through translate
  When a song in Uruguay is played on radio, television or at a party, the rights are collected by the General Association of Authors of Uruguay (Agadu) which retains the 60% of what is paid. The remaining 40% is divided equally between performers and record labels.
  Spotify says that it already pays for the rights. This understanding would mean that the players in Uruguay should work out how that is to be split.
  Spotify fears that the new law turns what they pay currently, simply into one share of the total, implying an extreme increase of the cost.
- I mean, it sounds like they want their artists to recieve fair compensation.
  
  I see that not everyone's a cynic, yet.
  What does that mean, though?
- And that's exactly why Spotify is leaving.
- Spotify already paid rights holder (...the record labels, which is the one supposed to pay the artists). Under the new law, its ill defined which could make spotify pay to artists on top of paying the record labels, thus double the pay.
Oh well, I suppose everyone will lay down and die with no access to music. What will artists do without that all important half a peso for 5000 streams?
Cash money says there's already a native competitor just waiting to get that money. If not there will be soon. Maybe people will just buy records again, shit. Uruguay isn't doing half bad, financially, maybe they'll bring tapes back.
It has been quite something to see American tech companies rolling out across the world trying to pull that same old "sign the EULA or lose everything" bullshit and it's just not working for them. Too bad we can't kick them in the dick like other nations can.
- Spotify is Swedish.
- Cash money says there’s already a native competitor just waiting to get that money
  There isn't and probably won't be. At least not one with a library even half a size to that of spotify. People will probably flock to some competition like apple music or youtube music (neither of those services, as they are not very popular, seem to have said anything about this copyright law amendment). Also a senator already pointed out that if you have a valid argentinian credit card (there's one very easy to get here), you can just register as an argentinian and pay less than a dollar instead of the seven dollars it costs here as a turnaround.
- We can... We're just too busy arguing over immigration, what gay/trans people and women are allowed to do, where the line is between church and state, and to what extent guns should be a part of our society... Oh and Trump.
So they admitted here that they don't pay artists fairly.
Fuck Daniel Ek.
W Uruguay?
Big Tech = Evil Tech
Good on the Uruguayan Parliament. For profit companies understand one thing, money. If enough people would understand this and be willing to deal with some inconvenience, companies like Spotify would come around surprisingly fast.
See, this is one of the reasons why I haven't listened to music in almost a decade. Paying fairly to artists is provably unaffordable for the average joe, unless a shady workaround like the streaming service subscription exists (and even then, that barely fills the belly of the artists that dedicate exclusively to art).
- Physical records make good money for the artists, if it weren't for the greedy discographies of course.
Firehawk52's Guide got you
There is VPNs so who cares 🤣🤣..
- Anyone who doesn't know how to use a VPN?
  
  So people who have smartphones but down know how to download apps? That doesn’t sound like a statistically significant amount of people.
  
  There shouldn't be anyone who doesn't know how to use a VPN in 2023.
So basically unaffordable for the people in that country?
- No, it's as indicated, that is, to have artists paid fairly for their creative talents. Trickle down economics exemplified. It is akin to you working your job through an agency but the agency paying you far less than minimal wage. Like a lottery, only a few will make real money.
  
  But according to the article 70% of the money they make from music is already going to record labels and publishers, so what exactly is Spotify supposed to do here to give more money to the artists?
Considering that there are 0 Uruguayan artists on Spotify, it shouldn’t make any difference.
- Citation needed*
  
  I was looking at a map the other day with my buddy Joe from New York, and I pointed at a blob in South America and said “Hey what’s that?!” He said “Uraguay.” I said “Yeah. I’m aware and comfortable with my gender, thanks. But what is country on the map?”
- Spotify claims that "because of streaming, the music industry in Uruguay has grown 20% in 2022 alone."
  Yeah, sure, you must be totally right.

55 comments