(CW: SA, transphobia) Possibly Rowling's most mask off moment yet
(CW: SA, transphobia) Possibly Rowling's most mask off moment yet
https://nitter.net/jk_rowling/status/1720423006495744378 https://nitter.net/jessiegender/status/1720848839031373903
(CW: SA, transphobia) Possibly Rowling's most mask off moment yet
https://nitter.net/jk_rowling/status/1720423006495744378 https://nitter.net/jessiegender/status/1720848839031373903
Sure thing, Rowling. Why don't you show us these supposed facts that contradict the statistics that show trans women are far more likely to be the victims of sexual assault than the perpetrators?
It's fascinating how Rowling projects her grievances with the patriarchy onto trans women.
it's the final stage of liberal feminism. petty traumas with no systemic causes and no wider solution need to be vented at the most vulnerable populations available. also explains the Clintonite criminal justice project.
Hello super predators!
all transpeople are r#pists is certainly a take to have, i hope she drowns in her own blood
It's becoming more common. We're getting extremely close to a place where trans people are predators by definition to these people. It's really scary
I hope that she contracts a chronic illness so painful she begs for euthanasia, and stays alive forever, unable to move but in excruciating pain. I don't think any death is too kind for this filth pile that people mistake for a conscious, compassionate being.
I didn't follow how unhinged she had become about it. Wow.
What can be the next move after this? Claiming she was r*ped by a transwoman?
She sucks shit but that first sentence has a lot of juice and could be repurposed
"Good for you, Bill Maher. Some imperial apologists prefer to advocate for racist colonialism from behind an anime cartoon, but you're doing it under your own name. Zionists need brave guys like you."
The final movie in the "fantastic beasts" series will have the protagonists actively trying to cause the holocaust and support Hitler because the villain in the movie is a camp trans character who opposes him. This will be demanded by Rowling herself.
Rowling is such a Slytherin 👍👍👍👍👍
I mean, she literally does act like Umbridge, a character she actively hates and wrote to be hated.
As my favorite non-Harry-Potter series once wisely said, “You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” 👍👍👍👍👍
This comment made me throw up a little
I blame millenials buying her crap for giving her such an outsized voice. Launch her into the fucking sun.
and everyone who bought her books, for good measure.
Hey don’t look at me I was a goosebumps/Animorphs kid.
Never read one of her books or saw any of the movies, thankfully. Her stuff always just seemed like dollar store Tolkien to me, plus I guess I was slightly older than the intended age range.
My most regretted purchase ever, by the way, was a Kid Rock CD and I am deeply ashamed of it to this day.
When I was like 13 I bought a T-Shirt off of Sonic sprite comic artist "Psyguy" (well, had my mom buy it, but yaknow). Years later he turned out to be one of the internet's biggest sex pests.
I also bought a ProJared tshirt at one point. His case is more complex I guess but its still a bad track record lol.
i'm gen z but i also read her books growing up. i'm really glad i started reevaluating them before she went fully mask off, or i'd have probably been really hurt by it, given that she's about a hairs breadth from calling for my torture and execution on the national news
Yeah heres likely to be some collateral damage there.
Begin the launch sequence!
In (some of) our defence the first few books appeared to be setting up for some good criticisms - they weren't resolved in the books they first appeared in, but they were highlighted in such a way it seemed to be drawing attention to real life injustices through the lens of a magical society.
But then they weren't resolved at all. The Weasley's poverty, the literal slavery, the systemic legal problems like a fucking soul eating prison - they wasn't going to be a real commentary, it was just showing off the features of the setting. And by that time we'd wasted our money on 4 or 5 books.
Launch anyone who bought the movies into the sun though.
Why the fuck is one of the richest, most famous people in the world taking the time to say unhinged shit to random people on Twitter with like 200 followers? Does she just sit around all day looking for obscure people to put on blast with her deranged bullshit?
Because she is unhinged and wants trans people dead. She is singularly obsessed with it.
I at least find
's psychology pretty transparent: he's desperate for the world at large to approve of him and think he's cool and funny. Rowling just seems to spend all her time looking for random folks saying positive things about trans people so she can personally attack them. It seems like it would be a really soul-corrosive hobby.Does she just sit around all day looking for obscure people to put on blast with her deranged bullshit?
Wouldn't be surprised tbh, her mind is fucking broken, I wouldn't be surprised she alienated most of her actual IRL friends with her deranged behavior.
Wasn't she all in with that lady that was quoted in that BBC article that had a fucking manifesto to kill trans people and a history of doing SA to other women?
yeah. actually she's all in with a bunch of people who have stated all trans people should be killed, as well as several sexual abusers and admitted rapists. i only know of the one person who did both and was quoted in a bbc article, but it would not surprise me if there were more
also i like your avatar
Just saying, there are countless, countless confirmed incidents of r@pe and general sexual abuse at those gay/trans conversion "therapy" camps by the counselors (the victims of which are almost all minors who are forced by their piece of shit parents to attend as these camps' primary demographic), which is still happening to this day. Far more than the number of confirmed LGBTQ+ predators. Call it whataboutism if you want, but it seems to me like it's your crowd that has a predator problem, Rowling.
hope she's killed and soon
better that she has a very embarrassing accident. we don't need to hand the worst people in the world a martyr.
you know i know where her boat that shes never been on is. just fantasizing.
Be a real shame if a hive of killer bees was in her room and the door got jammed
What a horrible disgusting person she is. I hope she chokes to death on her own vomit.
They haven't yet released the Minecraft and Fortnite crossover DLC that contains the content I want JK Rowling to play, at this point
So she just replied with "you're wrong" lol
I'm surprised she hasn't been publicly jumped yet
someone should parody her in minecraft
remember the 'i'd march with trans people if they were oppressed' tweet?
jkr confirmed rape activist
Court: asks (does not mandate) r@pe victim not to misgender her r@pist.
JK Rowling: is this r@pist rights activism?
Love to see people post screenshots of exhibits from their own Committee of Public Safety tribunals.
IDK who Zachary is but I now will build a statue of him
I wish a very dedicated cosplayer would practice IRL hexes on Rowling.
This is off-topic to the substance of the argument. I was talking to a friend about personality disorders a while ago and realized that there's a common argument/rebuttal pattern applied to any group accused of being a danger: trans people, racial minorities, people with mental health problems, etc. The rebuttal sucks:
A: X group commits lots of [type] crimes
B: Even if that were true, X group is more likely to be a victim than a perpetrator of [type] crime
B (alt): Even if that were true, X group is actually more likely than general population to be a victim of [type] crime
Note that cis men are at once (a) more likely to commit violent crime than general population (b) more likely to be victims of violent crime than general population (b) more likely to be victims of violent crime than they are to be perpetrators of violent crime. That's a farcical MRA talking point. These stats aren't telling us anything meaningful.
Instead of letting the opponent's claim stand like Coleman is doing, I think it is more convincing to either dispute it or offer a good explanation that neutralizes the claim. For instance, assuming there even is some kind of stat that trans women are disproportionate perpetrators:
There's a lot of stories you could tell. Just saying a different statistic is talking past each other and not convincing to the (entirely theoretical tbh) sharp-eyed reader who is somehow undecided on whether trans people should be allowed to live. If you're gonna ignore such an argument to offer a more convincing argument of your own, I think moving out of the realm of stats altogether is better.
(stolen joke) A transphobe, a racist and a antisemite walk into a bar. The bartender says: "hey arent you the woman who wrote those harry potter books?"
okay okay, i know jk rowling is horribly anti-semetic but i'd like to know how she is racist? i dont doubt it given the other info i have about her, but i'd like an example of her racism if possible
well there's the (only) asian character whose name is literally "Cho Chang"
or the one black person (of two!) named "Kingsly Shacklebolt"
oh and just for fun i'm pretty sure the one coded-irish character is constantly causing explosions? but we're getting into p fuzzy recall territory tbh, and i'm sure there's plenty more.
Read the harry Potter books... Well don't. But we got cho chang as the only Asian for example. What a name eh
Here's one example:
The way she handled Native Americans in the Harry Potter universe was racist and got a lot of complaints at the time. Here's an article about it.
european antisemitism is racist. it's theoretically possible to exclusively have a problem with religious practitioners of judaism, but that's not something that actually happens anymore. the goblins in her books are not shown to be practitioners of a bad cult, but bearers of undesirable racial traits.