French pension reform talks fail as projections show deficit to keep growing
French pension reform talks fail as projections show deficit to keep growing

www.france24.com
Business - French pension reform talks fail as projections show deficit to keep growing

https://www.worldeconomics.com/Thoughts/Frances-Retirement-Risk.aspx?ThoughtID=274
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yvq1jy2xgo
https://www.france24.com/en/france/20240620-how-france-s-far-right-changed-the-debate-on-immigration
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2024/09/28/french-public-debt-hits-new-high_6727571_19.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_in_France
https://www.politico.eu/article/markets-hold-their-breaths-as-frances-pensions-debate-faces-make-or-break-moment/
I mean, given that combination of factors, something has to give at some point. Declining fertility means that there are fewer workers entering the workforce to support retirees. People angry about immigration make it hard to fill in gaps in the workforce created via low fertility via immigration. Already-high taxation means that it's hard to raise taxes to fill revenue shortfalls and keep the French economy competitive. The debt being already high from COVID-19-related costs limits how much further the can can be kicked down the road by running a higher deficit. Opposition to a higher retirement age means that one can't cover the costs by decreasing the amount of time that people spend in retirement relative to in the workforce.
You can, to some degree, trade off one of those for another, but if all of them are an issue at the same time, there's limited room for the government to act. And a lot of those start creating positive feedback situations if one starts to get near trouble, which one doesn't want.
Worker productivity has dramatically increased since WWII. A single worker is able to produce a lot more food, healthcare, and so on than they did in 1950. Of course there's the common problem that a lot of the result of that productivity has been captured by the top. Probably less so in France than some other countries but still. If you look at the real economy, I think you might find that we are able to produce the basics needed with a small proportion of our working population. We already support a much higher retiree/worker ratio than we did a few decades ago and I think that's the reason. There are many workers in unproductive sectors that didn't exist before the financialization phase who could be doing more useful work too. All the computing and automation we build could be used to increase productivity in relevant sectors too, instead of maximizing the time other workers spend glued to their phones.
The living standard is also much higher now. More people expecting more help from the state with more complex problems. Let's for example take a premature baby that would have died 20 years ago can now be saved and can live a long life, but needing 24x7 care by medical staff. Or the fact that our parents and grandparents live longer, but care and medicine cost a lot more.
I'm not disputing that the top takes too much, but the standard of care, medicine and other things cost too.