I don't really like wine either, but you get the idea.

Because no one is illegal on stolen land.

I get the message, but it really makes it sound like you’re allowed to steal land and get away with it. Which I guess you can get away with it if you’re white taking the land from someone darker than you.

Which I guess you can get away with it if you’re white taking the land from someone darker than you
Nah. It’s whoever has the biggest weapons gets away with it. If you’ve got a larger country with a bigger stick standing behind you, you can attack anyone you want and no one says shit.
It also just sounds like stupid lib shit. No one is illegal–period. Nothing more needs to be said. If the land wasn't stolen, would it be okay to start labeling people illegal?
- No one is illegal–period.
  Which is, of course, a refutation of a ridiculous straw man, because no one is actually labeling the people themselves illegal, when referring to them having immigrated illegally. It's a deliberate cringy misinterpretation of simple shorthand.
  If you call someone a thief, are you saying that they are theft, or are you saying that they stole?
Mike Huackabee recently said, that Palestinians should just have some land somewhere in another "muslim country" implying they all would be the same anyways and have so much landmass and Israel has so little.
Well, by that logic the US Americans should get the fuck out of America, since they have so much space in Europe and give the land back to its legitimate people.

Malbec's the best, dude.

I wasn't much of a wine drinker when I was younger. Then, I switched to whites—they're usually sweeter, which is an easy transition into the wine world.

Malbec's the real deal red wine. It's super dry, no sugary sweetness, and goes with everything. If you're gonna drink wine, go for Malbec; you won't regret it.