When you get the joke, try to just give a subtle clue for the next person?
When you get the joke, try to just give a subtle clue for the next person?
Lol...it hit me square in the teeth the other day, so I just HAD to try my hand. 😂
18 comments
-
dirt_owl is the superb owl this is easy
-
Okay I give up. Someone spoil me.
-
-
I think most of the planet would like to see a multitude of crows in the oval office.
-
Now this is subtlety! 😉
-
-
-
Owldeeeeeer!
-
I'd rather see a Funkadelic of owls...
-
Birds...owls...
Powlament?
Does it involve a play on the words cloaca or nictitating membrane? More like...nictitating NO brains, am I right?
In short, the owl glossary didn't help.
EDIT:
I FIGURED IT OUT. I'm such a fucking idiot.
-
Powlament?
Ooh, ooh!
-
-
I think this is subtle? ::: spoiler spoiler What an interesting group :::
-
Now would you even say... legislative...?
-
-
The level of sloppiness of this AI slop is especially high
-
For sure! But the only reason I prodded the AI forward in such a way was to produce a silly joke. For a silly reason. For a well-known reason!
Or not...?
-
Joke is fine, it’s just sad to see something that looks so grotesque in a community otherwise devoted to nature photography and an appreciation of these beautiful animals.
Not that my opinion should necessarily be relevant to you in any way but I think taking the 10 mins to paste actual owl heads over an actual photo of a…room full of important looking people…would have been funnier while also actually possessing some aesthetic value
-
-
18 comments