2y ago

The Fall of Stack Overflow

observablehq.com The Fall of Stack Overflow

Over the past one and a half years, Stack Overflow has lost around 50% of its traffic. This decline is similarly reflected in site usage, with approximately a 50% decrease in the number of questions and answers, as well as the number of votes these posts receive. The charts below show the usage repr...

The charts below show the usage represented by a moving average of 49 days.

What happened?

Technology @kbin.social

wave_walnut @kbin.social

2y ago

The Fall of Stack Overflow

observablehq.com /@ayhanfuat/the-fall-of-stack-overflow

22 11

TechNews @radiation.party

irradiated @radiation.party

BOT

2y ago

The Fall of Stack Overflow

observablehq.com /@ayhanfuat/the-fall-of-stack-overflow

2 0

You're viewing a single thread.

260 comments

I routinely skip SO unless I've already exhausted most possibilities. If it was ever a good place to get answers, I frankly didn't see it. What I did see was infinite amounts of bitching about "bad" questions, non-duplicate duplicates, lazy-ass people who just wanted an excuse not to answer, and assorted people tripping on their little iota of perceived "power".
Hell, even the indexed results on Google etc. just stopped being even remotely useful a few years back. After that, most shit I searched for ended up in an unanswered and possibly locked question with some passive-aggressive bullshit remark. It's got the culture of helpfulness of a 2003 gaming forum - except the people telling everyone else to go fuck themselves are mods, not pubertal kids. (Although if the mods were pubertal kids that would actually explain quite a bit)
- This hasn't been my experience at all, but I'm old and have been using SO since it was new.
  I have stopped visiting it to answer questions because the questions aren't interesting anymore. They're either "how to do this incredibly obscure thing in SOMELIBRARY" (where I've never heard of that library) or "why does my function exit early at the first return statement instead of continuing on" (basic "you misunderstand programming so fundamentally a single answer is unlikely to help" kind of questions)
  As far as I can tell, the range of "I've tried this, and partially gotten it working, but this thing does FOO when it should do BAR" questions don't show up, or at least it doesn't show up when I open the site.
  Answering basic questions again and again and again isn't fun. It's something I could be paid to do, I suppose, but I'm not paid for that.
  
  Seriously, how should a community based on short two- to three-paragraph answers react to question after question like this:
  I am new to python. I would like to write a program which can collect information from multiple excel and pdf documents to output that in one single excel document to show similarities and differences between the documents . Is this possible ? If so, how and where would I start writing such a programme in python? Thanks
  I haven’t tried anything yet
  I mean, I'm glad that someone looks at that problem and thinks "programming could do this", because it could, but it's kind of a big task and getting someone from "I haven't tried anything and am brand new to python" to that is beyond any question-and-answer forum. Welcome to programming, you may be able to get there, but it's going to be a bit of a hike.
- Mostly it seemed to be people who didn't know what they were talking about answering questions badly in an attempt to win points, presumably in the belief that this would bolster their resume somehow. And people who can't tell a good answer from a bad one voting on the answers.

260 comments