With enshitification closing in on all aspects of the internet has the american tech industry ensured the internet will never evolve past where it is now?
I'm seeing an incredible turn towards the kind of organic platforms of the 1.0 web world. They may never hit the same level of popularity as the commercial platforms like Facebook and Twitter did, but these new platforms like Lemmy, Mastodon, and others are letting us build a new space.
Probably the best part is that so much of it is built on FOSS meaning that the monetization and enshitification by investors will have a much harder time taking root.
They can try but they'll never be able to reach all instances that defederates from them. Meta and the rest of the fediverse will be like two non-overlapping ecosystems.
Yeah but the beautiful thing about the fediverse is that instance admins can just be like “lol no, fuck you” and defederate, and moreover coordinate to blacklist anything affiliated with Meta et al.
And then there’s people like me who, as a result of the election, have started to think about how they could go work for tech in the context of some sort of fifth-column effort, because I fucking HATE the amount of societal damage these hypercapitalist megacorps are doing. But of course I would only do that in Minecraft.
Agree, but I fear they try to get those apps banned, similarly to what happened to tiktok (yes I know it's not FOSS) because the only reason why it was banned was because it was killing the revenue of FB and Twitter.
There's a phrase that I learned recently that feels relevant to this. "Hermeneutical Injustice". It means injustice that arises when we are literally unable to meaningfully discuss our experiences with others. For example, "sexual harassment" is a relatively recent phrase, coined in the 1970s, a period when more women were entering the workplace, and employers didn't have policies for how to respond to workplace sexual harassment. It's a useful phrase, both legally, and interpersonally, and having access to this phrase that describes something that was previously hard to articulate ("you quit your job because your boss was complimenting you?") has helped us to reduce hermeneutic injustice by helping us to better understand and respond to the underlying phenomena (for instance, we now understand that people of all genders may experience workplace sexual harassment)
"Hermeneutic injustice" is why I think the ridiculous prevalence of the word "enshittification" is a good thing. People have latched into that because although it may be a new word, the phenomena it describes have been happening for a while now. I've even seen less techy people using it. The anger I've been seeing extends beyond people who know about "enshittification", but its spread and usage is a useful snapshot of how many are feeling. It makes me feel hopeful.
I'm sleepy right now so I'll not attempt to discuss more concrete things driving this hope (such as "small web", Fediverse etc.), but the short of it is that I have a lot of faith in people. Leaning on our communities is how we survive and resist this bullshit, and there will always be people who want to build things for the love of it.
Well put, I think at first as well I felt like the term was a bit immature and used a bit too liberally when it first started picking up steam in 2023.
It really does describe a phenomenon that is becoming so widespread that I’ve softened on it and embraced it (as long as it’s used correctly)
No, the platforms are enshittifiying, but the underlying nuts and bolts of the internet are still there untouched and so far every attempt by big tech to enshittifiy/proprietarize those has thus far failed
I feel like smartphones have just made people “internet lazy” - myself included. The masses just want to get an app and let it accomplish whatever you need, without worrying about any kind of enshitification as long as it’s free.
I'm starting to feel like the Cyberpunk 2077 version of the internet is not too far-fetched. It's split into 2 parts:
The "old net" - This has been completely overrun by AI programs that are so fast and powerful they almost immediately compromise any non-AI powered system that connects to it.
The "net" - Blocked off from the old net by the "Blackwall" (a big firewall that keeps all AI out) is basically your standard internet that humans use via cybernetic implants.
I honestly could see AI basically filling the internet with so much garbage and malware that it becomes completely unusable. This is already starting to happen. However, if we create a new one with just human-controlled computers, I don't see how we could stop people from just connecting AI to that one.
The internet isnt a person or thing. Its a giant network and its literally whatever the nodes on the network want it to be. Thats why we are here having this discussion on lemmy.
The internet is so many different things all at once, you can't really generalize it or say the whole thing is being enshittified.
I think we all just learned a hard lesson about trusting companies where we are the product rather than the customers. People were very naive in the early days of social media, and advertising.
I use discord but i can't stand it as a platform for discussion. Forums, even reddit, seem so superior to me as a format for discussion and storing information. Maybe I haven't figured out discord yet
The internet, no. World Wide Web, unlikely. Commercial domains however have been shit and will continue to enshittify as long as people support their business models.
So... I'm not sure if this is an entirely rational thought.
I'd always wanted to do ham radio but hadn't bothered. Before my time, ham radio let you do amazing things that weren't otherwise very easy. Like have a group chat with a bunch of people all over the world. Except when I was looking for things to do, you could get on the Internet and chat with a bunch of people all over the world ... without the antennas and hardware and all.
Lately some stuff happened and my spouse's friend who lives near Asheville NC and lived through the flooding there where ham radio was the only working form of communications, so my spouse got pressured into buying a radio, which means that I got myself a license because ... well, radio works without much infrastructure?
Mostly I figure I needed to fill the void that was getting on Twitter if something happened locally.
Well we're literally in the middle of rolling out http3 so tech will never stop teching.
If you pine for the old internet spin up a BBS or PHPBB and enjoy some arcane discussions - those things still exist and hosting costs are cheaper than ever so if you pop 200 bucks into an account you can keep it going for decades.
There are plenty of active forums these days still on specific topics. Most work well on mobile too. I personally frequent about 4 different ones and using Hermit app makes it a great experience.
Never say never. Once the VCs wake up and realize there is no ROI left they will take their billions out of the pool and 90% of companies will struggle to actually create value from a hostile userbase.
I think the common person doesn't really care too much about anything except how many other people are on the platform.
If you could get a majority of people to use Lemmy or Mastodon, more would follow. The biggest barrier to attracting users isn't necessarily the layout, the content, the features, etc. it's getting people to know about it in the first place. The biggest advantage the corporate sites have, is advertising.
I only see advocation for things like Lemmy, Mastodon and other Fediverse/ActivityPub related sites on these sites. You're preaching to the choir. We're already here. Go advertise on Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and Shitter. This only has the unfortunate side effect of needing to use Facebook, Reddit, Instagram and Shitter to advertise.
Go advertise on Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and Shitter. This only has the unfortunate side effect of needing to use Facebook, Reddit, Instagram and Shitter to advertise.
Not sure about the others, but wasn't Reddit banning people for talking up Lemmy a while back (or at least removing the comments)?
See the enshitified hotspots as fly traps for the limp minded. An authentic, simple, commerce free web is still out there, one just needs to look outside of the drivel served up on page one of mainstream search engines
Like others have suggested already, I have no issue imagining the apparition of new space(s) that will themselves become true alternatives to the Web. Heck, the Web itself become the success it is as an alternative to other online spaces.
A bit like with TV. I have not owned a TV since the early 00s, because I consider TV mostly crappy content that is also over-saturated with ads, two things I'm not interested in wasting my time with. Luckily, there are alternative ways to access visual content that don't require me to watch a TV. But TV still exists for people that like it.
The real question should be: will people be willing to move away from what the web is becoming/has become, the place where all their friends/family/colleagues are, in order to populate a less shitty but newer kind of space? Looking around me, I have some doubts. I remember when blogs were new and cool. The intensity/quality in some of them was great and there were large readership. Today, it's barely if anyone will click on link that doesn't point to YT (or reddit, or some other social media)... That doesn't bode well, imho.
My only counterpoint is that people have always moved to the next thing the web has to offer once the old thing has become stagnant/particularly shitty and friends/'influencers' (in the more general sense) move too. Remember that one message board? MySpace? Nexopia, if you were a teenage Canadian at the right time (or predator, I guess)? ICQ? MSN? All once very popular, all now relics of a bygone age. And truly old heads will have reference points going even further back.
There's hope. Granted, we have far more people online than there were during previous shifts like these, and it at least feels like people are more willing to put up with bullshit from their online spaces than they used to be. But there's still hope.
From this perspective it kinda makes sense. Corporations have succeeded in making an internet they have complete control over and the users are so invested they have control over the users as well. Now say there are 10% of us that fall away, that's kinda of insignificant from the corporations point of view. I guess it becomes how malevolent/hostile the remaining 90% are programmed to be. Like us existing outside of that space we may protest looking in but have no hope of reaching anyone. Sorry, I'm still getting over a bug and not thinking 100% clearly.
So the answer is no but only because the web is only one part of the internet. Someone somewhere will create a new protocol that we never thought off and start a new service and no I'm not taking about the web3 scam and crypto. Stuff like gemini and tildeverse are pockets of the 90s internet. Still alive and kicking.
Enshittification is a consequence of private equity investments, so no. Companies who don’t take money from private equity will actually innovate. Whether they can survive the monopolies that do take private equity investments is another question.
The real problem is the need for constant revenue growth. If a company doesn’t care about constantly growing their revenue, they can put their funds toward long term projects that may not pay out until many years down the road. Those are the companies that truly innovate.
Plus there’s always room for new companies to come in and innovate, even with private equity money. Just don’t expect that from the already established companies.
Currently? Mostly making shitposts about chaining CEOs to boulders and casting them into the Sea, advocating to build big bronze statues of cold-blooded murderers, and openly wishing for certain people to be struck by lightning. Some real Biblical shit.
The internet, communications and how we use it will continue to evolve over time. Evolution, even in digital systems doesn't happen that fast, especially if always involves a human brain in the equation.
As long as we humans are part of the digital revolution, it will take hundreds or thousands of years to evolve (if we make it that long)
Anyone who thinks that anything that involves us poor apes can evolve within a few short years or even decades is only fooling themselves.
A neat thought experiment is instead thinking of what will happen once actual real world independent AI takes over. Once that happens, then the digital systems can evolve without us and then it can evolve in an accelerated manner.
When you think about it, us humans and our set organic brains are like the big rusted iron anchor that is holding back the digital powerboat. Once they cut the chain holding us to the boat, we'll stay at our place at the bottom while the boat disappears into the wild open ocean.