You're viewing a single thread.
If I were an IRS agent, I'd just hang out on these forums and start sending people catfishing messages.
An IRS agent like you will lose your job on Jan 20
I know, but they've had so much time to do it.
There’ll be plenty of work for IRS agents in running punitive audits of people and companies in the Emperor’s disfavour.
Sometimes I give them silly advice. Not anything that would actually cause a problem, but just saying they need to find a certain stamp for the document to be valid or whatever.
The problem is that these people have no way to pay their back taxes except rusted out old trucks and dilapidated huts. Then our billionaire overlords get away with murder even more despite actually having the resources to pay for their shit since it's another is agent not working the big, difficult case.
That's simply not true. Most SovCits are not impoverished like that. If they were, they wouldn't spend thousands of dollars to find the cheat code out of paying child support.
Source.
Well that does fit that petty tyrant attitude.
Getting people to pay the taxes they owe as members of society is so tyrannical, isn't it? Clearly the non-tyrannical thing would be to let people just get away with being leeches.
Yeah sure,
workworry about your feelings rather then do their actual job. Seems petty and tyrannical to me. Maybe, I dunno collect taxes instead of trolling assholes or something you know... Worthwhile.Still waiting on that ban explanation btw bud.
Since you haven't taken the hint yet and you are now violating Lemmy ToS and harassing me about something that didn't even happen in this community: you're not going to get any more explanation than the one you already got.
Now stop harassing me or I will go to the admin about it.
I can ask anytime, I can't harass you and I'm not.
You won't scare me with an admin bud, you're in the wrong here and it's very clear to see.
Also, no one is harassing you. We discussed something else and I added the fact you haven't responded to your mod mail nor in fact has anyone from that sub which from my research you are in charge of so the duty of explaining your actions on your sub rests quite obviously and logically.. on you.
which from my research you are in charge of
Oh do show mere where you researched this "fact." I'd love to see the "evidence" you have from your "research" that I am in charge of c/world.
Yes, ask me to explain myself while refusing to explain yourself. Logical.
You could just answer the question instead of this weird feogned offense.
Sure. I could.
But now that you've told this hilarious lie that you did "research" and discovered that I'm in charge of c/world (which I absolutely am not), why would I?
Hilarious lie?
You didn't ban me from c/world though it is quite telling that you've apparently bias banned enough people to confuse them. Though that also is strange because my name is right there and the modlog is public, it should be quite trivial to find out who I am and where you banned me.
Wait, so your "research" that shows I'm in charge of c/world is because I banned you for a small amount of time? Seriously?
Do you even know how Lemmy works?
Here's a hint. This is the list of mods in the sidebar of c/world. Mods are listed in the order which they were added. Notice I was last.
Maybe your "research" should have taken into account the idea that the very last person made moderator was somehow put in charge of the whole thing is ludicrous.
But sure, I'm in charge because I "bias ban" people, whatever that means. I mean if you did want to look at the modlog, you'd see that jordanlund does much more moderating in that community than I do.
I have the feeling that your "research" was you got mad that someone dared silence you and made a few very silly assumptions.
(P.S. Did your "research" tell you that you were unbanned three days ago? Because that's in the modlog.)
you are now violating Lemmy ToS and harassing me
Jesus fucking Christ you're not being harassed. Go touch some fucking grass, weirdo.
I guess all of their comments were removed and they were banned because of how non-harassing they were.