Bulletins and News Discussion from December 2nd to December 8th, 2024 - May A Hundred Hazel Flowers Bloom - COTW: Russia
Image is of one of the six salvos of the Oreshnik missile striking Ukraine.
The Oreshnik is an intermediate-range ballistic missile that appears to split into six groups of six submunitions as it strikes its target, giving it the appearance of a hazel flower. It can travel at ten times the speed of sound, and cannot be intercepted by any known Western air defense system, and thus Russia can strike and conventionally destroy any target anywhere in Europe within 20 minutes. Two weeks ago, Russia used the Oreshnik to strike the Yuzhmash factory in Ukraine, particularly its underground facilities, in which ballistic missiles are produced.
Despite the destruction caused by the missile, and its demonstration of Russian missile supremacy over the imperial core, various warmongering Western countries have advocated for further reprisals against Russia, with Ukraine authorized by the US to continue strikes. Additionally, the recent upsurge of the fighting in Syria is no doubt connected to trying to stretch Russia thin, as well as attempting to isolate Hezbollah and Palestine from Iran; how successful this will have ended up being will depend on the outcome of the Russia and Syrian counteroffensive. Looking at recent military history, it will take many months for the Russians and Syrians to retake a city that was lost in about 48 hours.
Even in the worst case scenario for Hezbollah, it's notable that Ansarallah has had major success despite being physically cut off from the rest of the Resistance and under a blockade, and it has defeated the US Navy in its attempts to open up the strait. Israel has confirmed now that their army cannot even make significant territorial gains versus a post-Nasrallah, post-pager terrorist attack Hezbollah holding back its missile strike capabilities. In 2006, it also could not defeat a much less well-armed Hezbollah and was forced to retreat from Lebanon.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis. Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Same, I've got one lib friend that is so close, recognizes the need to de-dollarize and destroy the US empire, but she still thinks the DPRK is an authoritarian hell, not AES, etc. Having a gotcha would be nice
Lots of resources on how the DPRK's governmental structure works.
why does the party general secretary appear hereditary?
Democratic centralism and combating revisionism. It keeps the head of the party stable while the nation is still at a state of frozen conflict with the occupiers in the south. It is de-facto hereditary, it's ok to admit that. But it's idealist to use this fact as proof that the DPRK is undemocratic. One has to analyze the material conditions (nuclear armed imperialist fraternal nation that wants you dead) to implement the necessary reform (eliminate any gorbachevs and yeltsins anywhere at the top of the party).
It's the same logic that libs use to call China undemocratic because the head of state eliminated term limits. It's a fixation on spectacle and not on true meaning which can only come from analysis.
It's also the same logic libs refuse to use on their own countries because they're ultimately just settlers who want to keep their hegemony intact. The American political structure is fundamentally broken and makes no sense unless you also understand that the USA is a hegemony empire at heart to serve landlords, oligarchs and defense contractors.
Also Kim Jong Un serves a partial ceremonial position, he does not have absolute authority over all affairs, that goes to the Supreme People's Assembly.
logic that libs use to call China undemocratic because the head of state eliminated term limits.
Honestly there's no logic to that. Term limits are undemocratic. I've only ever seen term limits used to keep popular presidents out of power for too long or remove them in a coup.
If the people want to vote for the same person over and over, that's democracy. To not allow them to is undemocratic.
I think it’s partly a result of pre-communist ideologies and the period of Japanese occupation leaving a cultural mark that profoundly normalized the practice, the idea of the nation as a family which “naturally” has a kindly patriarch, and then this idea got synthesized with Leninism.