Bulletins and News Discussion from November 18th to November 24th, 2024 - Could It Soon Be Azover? - COTW: Ukraine
back in my map era, we're ukrainemaxxing right now
Declarations of the imminent doom of Ukraine are a news megathread specialty, and this is not what I am doing here - mostly because I'm convinced that whenever we do so, the war extends another three months to spite us. Ukraine has been in an essentially apocalyptic crisis for over a year now after the failure of the 2023 counteroffensive, unable to make any substantial progress and resigned to merely being a persistent nuisance (and arms market!) as NATO fights to the last Ukrainian. In this context, predicting a terminal point is difficult, as things seem to always be going so badly that it's hard to understand how and why they fight on. In every way, Ukraine is a truly shattered country, barely held together by the sheer combined force of Western hegemony. And that hegemony is weakening.
I therefore won't be giving any predictions of a timeframe for a Ukrainian defeat, but the coming presidency of Trump is a big question mark for the conflict. Trump has talked about how he wishes for the war to end and for a deal to be made with Putin, but Trump also tends to change his mind on an issue at least three or four times before actually making a decision, simply adopting the position of who talked to him last. And, of course, his ability to end the war might be curtailed by a military-industrial complex (and various intelligence agencies) that want to keep the money flowing.
The alignment of the US election with the accelerating rate of Russian gains is pretty interesting, with talk of both escalation and de-escalation coinciding - the former from Biden, and the latter from Trump. Russia very recently performed perhaps the single largest aerial attack of Ukraine of the entire war, striking targets across the whole country with missiles and drones from various platforms. In response, the US is talking about allowing Ukraine to hit long-range targets in Russia (but the strategic value of this, at this point, seems pretty minimal).
Additionally, Russia has made genuine progress in terms of land acquisition. We aren't talking about endless and meaningless battles over empty fields anymore. Some of the big Ukrainian strongholds that we've been spending the last couple years speculating over - Chasiv Yar, Kupiansk, Orikhiv - are now being approached and entered by Russian forces. The map is actually changing now, though it's hard to tell as Ukraine is so goddamn big.
Attrition has finally paid off for Russia. An entire generation of Ukrainians has been fed into the meat grinder. Recovery will take, at minimum, decades - more realistically, the country might be permanently ruined, until that global communist revolution comes around at least. And they could have just made a fucking deal a month into the war.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis. Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
I've just seen someone claim 'Tim Waltz was also an excellent VP pick who appealed to progressives.' I'm not yank so could someone break down if there is any truth to that? tbh not knowing about about him I assumed he was a stereotypical 'safe' center-right white guy, is he closer to a Liz Warren or even a Sanders,?
He did some good work in Minnesota (at least compared to other blue states), mostly because there are some left-wing politicians in the state who forced him to do this, because Minnesota's Dem majority is very fragile and just a few angry leftwingers are enough to kill every bill, so he had to do something for them (pass a couple of good bills).
But after he was picked as VP, he just repeated the same talking points as Kamala, even said "the expansion of Israel is necessary" on the debate stage. So he didn't appeal to progressives, but everyone just assumed that he was picked because the Kamala campaign decided to reject Bidenism and try to pretend being left-wing for the general election campaign. But that never happened.
Yeah, there was about a week after his nomination, and before Harris took any actual positions on anything, where people were able imagine she was a progressive. But she ended that pretty quickly and Waltz followed along awkwardly.
A lot of democrats would be fine allowing every bill to get killed if it meant denying the left any wins, and that coalition could have easily shattered. Walz is about as good a governor that Minnesotan dems could hope for.
I'd never heard about the guy before he was picked by Kamala. Then I heard the progressive types talking up his bonafides but looking in to him I think he killed a bill that would've made Uber drivers get healthcare and as others have said he got praised by Trump for his crushing of dissent dhring the Floyd protests.
Uber killed that bill, or alternatively, that bill was doomed because libs didn't plan for the retaliatory capital flight.
Basically, rights were being given to Uber drivers and Uber promised to completely kill service in days. With taxi services being a shadow of what they were, this would have left tens of thousands of people with no transportation and thousands of drivers with no jobs. Walz vetoed the bill because shit was going to hit the fan
He definitely appealed to progressives, but the Harris campaign basically muzzled him and told him to stop talking about anything progressives like withing a couple weeks of getting picked.
Tim Walz isn't that left, but he genuinely sees no purpose in ceding anything to republicans when he's got the power to refuse them. You cannot say the same of Harris