Their ideals go out the window when it targets groups they deem undesirable. Some other state Libertarian party responded showing how NH Libertarian party policy is specifically anti capital punishment.
Uh no, don't disrespect children like that. They're smarter than this. But one thing I know for sure, libertarians sure do like children... :libertarian-approaching:
Just a bit of friendly advice from a fellow Libertarian, this sounds ALOT like the 14 words, and prob should be taken down, or altered. You're making their case for them.
Libertarian... nationalists? As in you support a nation? A state? Libertarian state-ists? May as well call yourselves the square circle party. We're squares who believe in circles! Yeah that's logically consistent I swear!
Most libertarians I've met are also nationalists. Especially ones that are anywhere near their local party. They tend to also be pretty extreme nationalists, believing all the war hype unconditionally.
They could be using it in the original sense,where it means a community of people tied together by a common cultural heritage and not in the nation-state sense
Which, don't get me wrong,it's still incredibly racist,as the "white" nation is a fabrication of the American state as opposed to a natural cultural identity
I called that "just joking, unles..." tactic "Schrodinger's Asshole" until I was informed that Schrodinger, like American Libertarians, was both an asshole and a child predator so the "yes/no" box gag doesn't really apply; it's more "yes/yes."
The NH libertarian party was taken over by a group of straight up facists. Libertarians suck for a lot of reasons, but this group is much worse. They had a "slavery was good for black people" post a while back.
They had a “slavery was good for black people” post a while back.
This is not much more extreme than the average liberal who honest to God believes that the colonisation of the third world was a net positive, or at least "nuanced".
This goes for 99% of fascist beliefs. Tone them down a bit and you get liberalism. It's why liberal republics are incubators for fascism.
Oh sure, the bourgeoisie are able to call for the liquidation of the poor and no one bats an eye. But when I say that the rich must be bound by the same laws as us poor folk everyone loses their minds.
what is even the fucking difference between fascists and libertarians?
First as a tragedy, then as a farce (for all the libs, libertarians included, that have come since). They've been kicking a dead horse for almost a century now tbh, though I suppose there's a sort of (deeply tired and terrible) humor to it, as they can always discover new pathetic lows for humanity.