JD Vance Doubles Down on Attack on 'Childless Cat Ladies'.
JD Vance Doubles Down on Attack on 'Childless Cat Ladies'.
Vance "meant no disrespect to cats, but he did mean to demean women and still holds the view in 2024 that they should be punished for not having children."
You're viewing a single thread.
On May 19, 1992, during a crucial part of the presidential campaign, Vice President Dan Quayle delivered a speech on family values that came to define him nearly as much as his famous “potato” gaffe. During the speech, he criticized Murphy Brown a fictional 40-something, divorced news anchor on a popular situation comedy for her choice to have a child outside of marriage. Quayle argued: “Bearing babies irresponsibly is simply wrong.
Same Shit Different Decade
And then the show worked it into the script. Wooha mofos.
So I just went and revisited that whole thing. I remember it vaguely, but not any details.
The gist was that Murphy was deciding whether to have the baby or abort it and the Republican vice president says she's terrible for having it because she's not married.
Of course, I guess the intent was that she was supposed to marry whoever got her pregnant, but it presents as she should have aborted it. Interesting in today's forced birth environment.
Of course, I guess the intent was that she was supposed to marry whoever got her pregnant
I think it's worse with some of these nutjobs. They'd say you shouldn't be sleeping with someone you aren't married to, it's the extra level of "irresponsibility" they want to slander you with as well. Unmarried and promiscuous...
If Republicans had their way, executing unmarried pregnant women for having sex outside of marriage would be some sort of exception to a fetus' right to life...
Yeah he wasn’t pandering to 1992 republicans, he was pandering to 1960s republicans.
And he was VP only because Bush the I should have gone to jail for Iran Contra. The more things change amirite
an emmy-nominated episode, at that. (for directing, peter bonerz)
Exsqueeze me? Peter who?
Ew.
Taken out of context, the phrase almost sounds like it could be used to argue for education, contraception, and healthcare access, not whatever grossness he's actually meaning in context.
I agree it should only be done responsibly, which is why I'm in favor of people have the information and tools to ensure it only happens when they're prepared and able to do so.