2y ago

Michael Imperioli forbids 'bigots and homophobes' from watching his work following Supreme Court ruling

www.cnn.com

Michael Imperioli forbids 'bigots and homophobes' from watching his work following Supreme Court ruling | CNN

Actor Michael Imperioli has something to say about the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in favor of a Christian web designer who refuses to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings.

5 comments

False equivalence, he's not being forced to do anything.
Lady is a shit stain let's be clear but she is well within her rights to refuse service to anyone on any grounds. in fact her being honest about her bigotry is a good thing as it allows others to avoid her.
- her rights to refuse service to anyone on any grounds
  Usually true, except when it comes to discrimination against people of protected class for being under that protected class, which is why this ruling is so concerning.
  The reality is that this sort of discrimination happens all the time under the guise of other rationale and is hard to stamp out (see: real estate redlining, gerrymandering, employment and rental discrimination, etc.), but theoretically a disenfranchised person with documentation can still seek recourse under the law.
  This ruling (as well as the general apprehension around queer people living publicly) has laid the groundwork for christofascism to further underclass those (and other marginalized) communities and makes the violent rhetoric coming from "family values" white supremacist extremists more palatable to the public.
  It is incredibly dangerous and further damages whatever remains of SCOTUS' credibility.
  
  Being gay or trans isn't a protected class. The First Amendment and US Constitution trumps a class of anything.
  
  It is a protected class
  The first amendment is the thing you're missing with all of this. People can discriminate against gay people. But only if it takes away their first amendment. The courts ruled that art should not be forced. So they don't have to serve gay people. But if someone is selling a car, that has nothing to do with art.
  
  It is not a protected class at the federal level. It is in many states.
  However, part of the argument in favor of making same sex marriage a right, as ordered in Obergefell, so that no state can refuse to marry same sex couples, is that the only difference between an opposite sex couple and a same sex couple is the sex of one of the people. Hence, the discrimination is on the basis of sex, which is a protected class federally.
  Why that same argument wouldn't apply to the more recent web designer case is beyond me.