I find this to be most accurate with Debian
I find this to be most accurate with Debian
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/83b56851-e0d4-4b5d-86e5-3ffe9df751b9.webp?format=webp&thumbnail=128)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/83b56851-e0d4-4b5d-86e5-3ffe9df751b9.webp?format=webp)
I find this to be most accurate with Debian
You're viewing a single thread.
Do you work for the North Korean government or something OP? Why discourage people from keeping their systems secure?
What they are referring to is people just don't update their server because during that time they wouldn't be able to make a profit. This goes more to middle siszed businesses but happens rather often
Blows my mind, lol. Usually means no redundancy that allows one set to be done while the other set handles the traffic.
"Why should we pay for another server one works just fine, a second would just be waisted money."
Also
"We need 9 9s of reliability or the company will fail."
Yeah, it is quite common, I can confirm... well, at least around here it is.
Just a hunch, but it feels like you are living in the same country as I.
Macedonia? 🤨
Okay, maybe not.. sorry
Meeh, worth a shot 🤷. Shitty contries all over the place 🤷 😂.
Indeed!
I was making a joke
Joke transfer unsuccessful. Server crashed. Time to update the joke server.
Well seems like i missed this one
Security is an art... the art of not giving a fuck about your data
-Op, probably