Barely a day after the shooting, right-wing politicians and pundits lined up to claim Moreno was a deranged trans woman.
The suspect in the Texas megachurch shooting on Sunday was not transgender, officials have confirmed. But that hasn’t stopped Republican politicians and conservative media from pushing yet another “trans mass shooter” conspiracy theory.
The shooting occurred on February 11, when 36-year-old Genesse Ivonne Moreno allegedly opened fire in Lakewood Church, a large evangelical megachurch in Houston where Joel Osteen serves as senior pastor. Police say they shot and killed Moreno in the ensuing gunfight, during which two others were also “shot in the crossfire” and wounded, including Moreno’s seven-year-old son, according to the Associated Press.
Barely a day after the shooting, right-wing politicians and pundits lined up to claim Moreno was a deranged trans woman, based only on now-debunked evidence. On X, formerly Twitter, anti-LGBTQ+ propagandist Chaya “Libs of TikTok” Raichik claimed that the Lakewood shooting was “[a]nother act of trans terrorism,” and accused “the LGBTQ movement [of] turning youth into violent extremists.” Others swiftly followed suit: Missouri Rep. Josh Hawley wrote Moreno was “a transgender, pro-Palestine radical,” and Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene simply called her “a trans from El Salvador.” Donald Trump Jr. and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz also boosted the claims on social media this week.
As The Advocate also noted, a Fox News article on Tuesday also claimed Moreno was transgender, but the article was later edited to walk back that claim, after police clarified there was no evidence to support it. (Raichik, Greene, and Cruz’s posts were still online at time of writing.)
The notion that Moreno was trans may have come from confusion over aliases police said Moreno used, as well as names under which she was previously charged. Analysis by the watchdog group Media Matters found that MSNBC also reported Moreno was trans on Tuesday, appearing to draw their information from initial police reports.
Multiple court records dating back as far as 2005 indicate that Moreno always identified herself as a woman regardless of her name, the AP reported, and an attorney who previously represented her said there was “no indication” she was trans. During a press conference this week, police also confirmed that Moreno was the biological mother of the seven-year-old who was critically injured in the shooting.
See this is the kind of stuff that makes leftists look bad. Sex is also determined during birth, so does that make doctors rightwingers?
Rightwingers are not checking genitals to take pictures (you are weaponising pedophilia and harming actual victims), and the conversation around this stuff is extremely complicated if you bring public washrooms into the conversation. There are people who abuse gender change to gain access to the opposite sex, both in washrooms and jails, and do bad things.
Nobody really feels safe with a transphobe, and even cis people find they are just sugarcoated jerks, but that is not the point. More discourse needs to happen without intentional distortion or targeting of anyone, based on hard evidence.
I found Jubilee's trans liberals versus trans conservatives Middle Ground debate really good. It highlights most of the unhinged issues in discourse currently.
If it isn't pedophilia it's something else: beating their wives, their children, other forms of abuse such as neglect. The GOP literally has attempted numerous times to revoke age of consent laws, laws against child marriage, and child labor laws.
Conservative parents are outspoken about their "right" to abuse their kids through depriving them of necessity or beating them.
The world does NOT revolve around Uhmerican politics or whatever the fuck your ideology or beliefs are. It is hard to take you seriously after that one. Your statement is so generalised that I need to take issue with that. You cannot even generalise Republicans altogether, because Democrats engage in similar things, looking from Epstein and Ghislaine's friends. And you are hurting pedophilia victims by being so liberal with your statement..
Yeah, OP sounds like they're taking the SM rhetoric literally and running with it. That's unhealthy, and why I also push against such rhetoric myself.
I, too, like to poke fun at politicians, but at the end of the day, I know a lot of people on both sides of the aisle (most of my family are conservatives, many of my coworkers are progressives), and none exhibit any of the signs OP is talking about.
Pedophiles et al are a tiny portion of the public, Republicans are at most half, so the numbers just will not add up. Also, it turns out most people don't agree with the rhetoric prominent people in their party spew, they're just there because they think their party's policies are the direction the nation should go. My family held their noses and voted for Trump, my coworkers held theirs and voted for Clinton/Biden, neither group actually likes their representatives...
I believe pedophiles exist more among liberal "centrists" than rightwingers, because liberals always weasel around sexual liberty and freedom to think whatever they want. Too much freedom and privilege allows for never denying such perversions, and engaging in them freely. This is also observable with a suspicious number of pornstars and Onlyfans women engaging in zoophilia, and those surely are not rightwingers. Every perversion is not equally bad, and nothing matches pedophilia, but most can disgust people at varying degrees.
Anyway, that part aside, calling every "enemy" X or Y thing is really bullshit. I will never side with people that do it, and anyone with critical thinking and a few braincells should also refuse to participate in such unhinged rhetoric rituals.