The two-state solution is the only way to fundamentally resolve the Palestinian question, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Wednesday.
When meeting the press after presiding over a high-level meeting of the UN Security Council on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, stressed that the two-state solution is the only way out.
The settlement of the Palestinian question does not lack for grand plans or slogans, but the courage and actions to stand up for justice, Wang said.
"The two-state solution is the bottom line for international justice. There is no stepping back from that. Independent statehood is an inalienable national right of the Palestinian people, a right that cannot be traded away," he said.
"In the face of the historical injustice long suffered by the Palestinian people, no one has an excuse to procrastinate and there is no justification for inaction. When it comes to the issues bearing on the future of the Palestinian people, no country has a veto right," said Wang.
The Palestinian question is at the heart of the Middle East issue and must be prioritized, rather than marginalized, on the international agenda, he said, noting that only when the two-state solution is fully implemented can the Middle East enjoy genuine peace and Israel enjoy lasting security.
China calls for the convening of a more broadly-based, more authoritative, and more effective international peace conference to further build consensus on promoting peace and work out a concrete timetable and roadmap to push for a comprehensive, just, and lasting settlement of the Palestinian question, he said.
Also not included in the news report is this following Q&A at the end of the press meeting:
Q: I was wondering why is it so hard in your opinion for the Security Council (as a permanent member) to condemn Hamas, and since you're here, we're very concerned about the pneumonia cases in China. Are you concerned about opening up the country to foreigners without visa regarding this?
A: Well it is first and foremost up to the people in Palestine to decide how to view Hamas. China always stand firmly against all forms of terrorism, in the meantime we emphasize that there should be no double standards when it comes to opposing terrorism, and such opposition of terrorism should not be targeted against any particular ethnic group or religion.
China has a fully-fledged medical system. Recently we have seen some clusters of flu cases among children in certain parts of China. In fact that is a very common phenomenon in many countries, and in China that has been put under effective control
China's interactions with the international community will not be affected by any factors, and we welcome more visits from friends from across the world, including you.
I'm sceptical about two-state solution in 1967 borders. Palestine is split in two part, and one of them is landlocked, it doesn't bode well for development and actual independence. I'm more in favor of one-state solution.
I personally see a two state "solution" as a necessary step towards a free Palestine. What currently exists is effectively a one state solution, with one settler colonial state.
Wouldn't a globally recognized Palestinian state be much better situated politically, economically, and even militarily to both protect the Palestinian people and to continue the fight towards expelling the colonizers completely?
Yeah, but I guess I'm thinking that maybe if it's part of some international initiative with China and Russia involved, it might at least be something capable of providing better access to food and water.
So you think the current situation with effectively no Palestinian state is more conducive towards victory? At what point during the struggle does a Palestinian state get established then? Only at the very end?
What you are saying is exactly what was used to justify the Oslo accords. That path has already been tried and the result of it is the traitorous Palestinian authority that you see today. A Palestinian state that's militarily antagonistic to israel will not be allowed to exist while israel has the power to prevent it, and if Israel does not have the power to prevent it, it will not have the power to defend its own existence. There is no need to keep rehashing this same rhetoric.