Jay-Z accused in a civil lawsuit of raping a 13-year-old girl in 2000 along with Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs
Jay-Z accused in a civil lawsuit of raping a 13-year-old girl in 2000 along with Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs
Jay-Z responded with a lengthy statement calling the allegations "idiotic." The accuser is anonymous.
You're viewing part of a thread.
Sounds like people have known for a while and haven’t prevented kids from being around them.
6 14 ReplyWhy do you think that is an excuse for rape?
16 2 ReplyLmfao. Excuse? I don’t. I’m just not shocked at all a groupie fucked a musician. Really, the “suit” should be tried for trafficking.
4 5 ReplyNo. It should be for rape. If he did it, he raped her. An adult having sex with a 13-year-old is rape.
12 2 ReplyWhat if she lied about her age?
3 8 ReplyAnd there it is- another person deciding that women should always be suspected of lying about being raped so they can get money.
11 6 ReplyRich people can’t rape people because rape isn’t a crime for rich people because rich people can lie, rape, and kill anyone they want because laws aren’t for rich people.
So I dunno what you’re upset about. He’s rich. Duh. He commits crimes. His next album will sell more because of this.
5 8 ReplyUnless they're in a civil suit. Which is what is happening,
But sure, she totally lied about her age back then as part of her plan to do a civil suit decades later or something.
And it's not like you can tell someone is a barely pubescent child just by looking at them, can you?
Oh wait, you absolutely can.
9 1 ReplyImagine knowing the power dynamic between a world famous star and a teenage fan, and then blaming the fan. Some people's moral compass is screwed beyond repair.
3 0 ReplyA combination of hero worship and misogyny is not a good combination.
3 1 Reply
If sex act proven to have happened, it is statutory rape. Groupie or not, consent or no consen.
10 0 ReplyAin’t a crime if you got the dough. Arrest the guy who brought her to the house. He’s not rich. That’s a crime.
3 9 Reply