You're viewing a single thread.
“Democrats say ‘Vote’” but many didn’t vote, or voted third-party in 2016.
This Supreme Court is a result of that election.
Congratulations on demonstrating how to hand the government to Republicans.
Let’s not do that any more.
I love how this is painted entirely as the fault of people who chose not to vote, and not the fault of the Democrats who seem to try their best to run the shittiest possible candidate. If Democrats would have run a candidate that was worth voting for, maybe more people would have turned out to vote for their candidate.
The gap between Hillary's popular vote win and Trump's electoral college win is the biggest gap in US history. We've never had so many votes ignored. I agree with you the voters aren't too blame.
Complaining about the electoral college is a different argument altogether
A valid argument
This community is designed to argue the system should be changed not which fascist sucks slightly less.
People from world don't like that kind of thinking sadly
Liberals have no place here
Good. Just hope they don't start a crusade against this comm like they do against others :(
That's why I'm so heavy on the moderation. They'll absolutely derail any community if given the opportunity.
I know some people probably get caught in the crossfire though, and I feel bad about that.
Every nation has the government it deserves. Individuals, on the other hand, good people — they always get fucked. There’s no escape from the mediocrity and subhumanity of the masses.
If republicans thought that way they wouldn’t have a Supreme Court majority.
I’ve been voting for decades. I rarely get to vote for a candidate I truly support. Most of the time I vote for the candidate that is closer to what I want than their opponent. It’s the unfortunate nature of the two-party system, but I never let my power to vote go unused.
Biden was a popular pick because he fits the demographic of people who vote:
- Father figure who will take care of you
- Loves his family
- Name recognition
- Is affiliated with Obama when times were good.
- Isn't Trump in every way
I'm not sure how people don't recognize that it's a popularity contest. One side wants good people in there that they can trust. Biden is trustworthy even if you don't agree with everything he does. Think of every other possible candidate and if you have to tell all your friends about them or they already know who they are. Trust isn't even on the table yet.
Memes like these send a clear message:
Let's give republicans all the power, one cynically cherry-picked narrative at a time. Hold Democrats to a perfect standard, dismiss any such consideration for republicans. Give no context. Play the heroic martyr while doing nothing.
In 2016 Democrats ran a widely disliked neoliberal through a heavily biased primary and wonder why they lose.
She wasn’t disliked because she was a neoliberal, she was disliked because 1. Woman 2. Huge history of political baggage going back 30 years 3. 5 year long intensive republican smear campaign
She's generally dislikable. Calling anyone who doesn't like her a sexist is an example of the attitude that continues to help the Republicans win elections.
She was shady. She was manipulative. I saw it firsthand during the Iowa caucuses of 2016 when she sent out a guide on “how to run a caucus” with a bunch of stuff that was intentionally misleading to favor an establishment candidate.
You’re saying an establishment candidate sent out ‘how to run a caucus’ with suggestions that favored an establishment candidate?
Not suggestions, misinformation. Like it lied about how a caucus should be run, lied about what happens in a disagreement, lied about how delegates have to vote. Like someone in our precinct ended up calling the Iowa DNC to confirm that information that Clinton’s campaign provided was wrong.
It was much longer than 5 years. Fox News threw shit on her from day 1. And when she played a role in trying to implement single payer healthcare they turned it into a vendetta. More like 20 years.
Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. What more would you have us do? We're past the point of voting being the only thing you have to do to resist, and we're past the point of individuals being responsible for where we are. Levers are being pulled that the public and voters have no control over. If you're not in an organization that opposes fascism in some way, you're not doing enough.
If you voted for Hillary in 2016, my comment wasn’t directed at you.
The point is, Hillary won the popular vote. By a lot. That’s the only thing that should matter in a democracy. We’ve been robbed of our agency and self-determination. We’re past the point where voting alone can make a difference. They won. They finished their fascist foundation, they have shielded themselves from accountability and consequence, they have given themselves the power of fiat at almost every level. This was always their plan, and it’s time we seize back everything that was stolen from us.
You weren't robbed of it, you never had it.
Oh, I totally agree it’s all that should matter. If the Nation Popular Vote bill gets signed by 61 electoral vote states, then we’d actually have a direct democracy.
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com
Until then, land will continue to get a louder voice than people.
The Democrats are complicit. The Republicans are at least forthcoming with their goals. "We're going to burn this shit to the ground". Whereas the Democrats are like "vote for this corporatist candidate that nobody likes or we'll let the Republicans burn this shit to the ground".
It's clear that you didn't understand the meme nor do you understand this community. I'll make this clear, you cannot win in a rigged system. On top of that when the Democrats win we get jerks like Genocide Joe (btw any genocide sympathetic comments will be removed).
"BTW anyone who disagrees with me will be censored"
Great debate skills there, Hass.
This is NOT a debate community
We don't want debatelords here
Genocide deniers aren't worth debating