Remote View
So much for "progress"
So much for "progress"
You're viewing a single thread.
231 comments
-
I bought a 3br 2ba 1.7k sqr house in the suburbs in 2017 for 135k and a hybrid car with 10k miles on it for 20k a few years ago. I'm really confused at these numbers. Are people just living outside their means and hoping collectors won't come knocking? I was making 55k at the time and I had no real financial troubles.
-
Huh. I wonder what happened between 2017 and today?
https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/mortgages/housing-bubble
Also...
https://www.bankrate.com/mortgages/historical-mortgage-rates/
This has some serious boomer "I paid $25 a credit in college so I don't see why you are all taking out big loans" vibes to it.
-
Thats a lot more recent than 1971.
-
Maybe that's because they were talking about what changed between 2017 and today.
I'm not a mathematronicist, but I'm pretty sure 1971 came before 2017.
-
Whatever you say mathemetron
-
-
-
So doesn't that mean it's a housing bubble issue? It seems like the focus on 1971 is designed to mislead people to think it's not a (very) recent phenomenon. This just seems like another "grr boomers" post which is just more division that serves to redirect anger from the ultra wealth.
-
Is housing the only thing mentioned in the meme? Is the fact that housing is even more obscenely expensive than it was in 2017 so that far fewer people can afford it than even could then some sort of proof that things are better now?
-
-
-
Can't speak for everyone, but COVID really drove up prices. Imo, there has been some gauging since then by keeping supply low. However, at least in my neck of the woods, prices seem to be going down and feels like we are getting back to pre-covid.
-
The car metric is for a new car. I think it's a valid assessment even if buying a used car is the better option for most people.
-
A 17k Sq ft house for 135k? I'm calling bullshit. Maybe 1.7k.
-
Ah, yes, you're absolutely correct.
-
-
231 comments