Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.
Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works::Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.
If AI is just blatantly copy and pasting what it read, then yes, I see that as a huge issue.
That’s in no way agreeing “that’s it’s a massive clusterfuck that these companies just purloined a fuckton of copyrighted material for profit without paying for it”. Do you not understand that AI is not just copy and pasting content?
Um, you implied it when you said the other guy was agreeing with you, when he was clearly not? How else could you possibly think he agrees? Piss poor reading comprehension perhaps?
Only in the last few comments, because unlike me you continually refuse to engage with more constructive content. But from reading the rest of the thread, I see you’re always like that once you run out of talking points.