Sam Altman Says AI Using Too Much Energy, Will Require Breakthrough Energy Source
Sam Altman Says AI Using Too Much Energy, Will Require Breakthrough Energy Source
"There's no way to get there without a breakthrough," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.
![Sam Altman Says AI Using Too Much Energy, Will Require Breakthrough Energy Source](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/438780ac-511c-49c9-b879-04d2dea902a8.jpeg?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
"There's no way to get there without a breakthrough," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.
You're viewing a single thread.
The human brain uses about 20W. Maybe AI needs to be more efficient instead?
97 1 ReplyPerfect let's use human brains as CPUs then. Not the whole brain just the unused bits.
61 3 ReplyI've seen that film
54 0 ReplyIt's what matrix would've been if the studios didn't think people would too dumb to get it, so we ended with the nonsense about batteries.
45 0 ReplyThey also thought we wouldn't understand how Switch could be a woman in the matrix but a man in the real world. So they just made the character a butch woman because apparently that's easier somehow. So many little changes like this were made.
44 2 Reply
Flubber!
6 0 Reply
We use all of our brain. Well, some of us try to anyway.
20 0 ReplyI would love it (if there exists a FOSS variant of that) imagine being able to run a LLM, or even LAM in your head,
wait…
🤔
3 1 ReplyFOSS Neuralink
4 0 Reply
36 0 ReplyThat would require a revolutionary discovery in material science and hardware.
5 0 ReplyAnd yet we have brains. This brute force approach to machine learning is quite effective but has problems scaling. So, new energy sources or new thinking?
10 0 ReplyWe just run the AI for a gazillion epochs and then it's
overfittedevolved intelligence. Thanks Darwin we did it again.7 3 Reply
It'd be way easier to just grow brains instead
1 0 Reply
We invented computers to do things human brains either couldn't do, or couldn't do fast enough.
3 0 Reply