It aint that hard, fuck wits
It aint that hard, fuck wits
230 comments
-
C is yielding to a pedestrian, but carbrain D cannot fathom yielding to anything smaller than their car.
-
I've been car A and still had car D behind me beep at me. We hate car D.
-
Were this a 2 lane roundabout, car d would be changing lanes to bypass car c, nearly striking that pedestrian
-
Pedestrian crossing without traffic lights at a 2 lane roundabout entry? That's just murderous design.
-
Traffic lights on a roundabout kinda defeats the purpose doesn't it? might as well signalize the intersection
-
Signalised lead ins are helpful to solve flow issues caused by an imbalance in traffic direction at certain times of day. When you get too much traffic building up that can't enter the roundabout due to no gaps you activate the red light before the entrance dominating traffic flow to give a period where the other directions can move through. The actual roundabout works as per normal and you don't have to deal with lights during non-peak periods.
Lights on a roundabout make it not really a roundabout but an unholy mishmash of intersection design. I've got one near me and the only thing going for it was that converting a roundabout was significantly cheaper than the flyover intersection it really should be made into.
-
There's only one or two in my area that would warrant adding signals, but they're only backed up during rush hour by people trying to take a "shortcut" around the highway traffic. So I consider them kinda self limiting due to the traffic. Not many more people try to take that route at that time when they're aware that it's clogged in the direction of rush hour traffic.
The other is right next to a private school and is only clogged because nobody uses their bus service, so, I don't have any sympathy for the parents.
-
-
Tho not preferable, there's cases where it can work. The roundabout layout still provides a better (easier) entry to the crossroads, the traffic lights can create a "cadence". Technically not a roundabout anymore, it does use some of it's qualities.
Anyhow, pedestrian crossings on 2 lanes right before any kind of intersection without any lights is way more dangerous than a roundabout with lights.
-
-
Try a 3 lane roundabout entry. I cross that shit twice a day on my commute to work every fucking day. Other options are very far out of the way as to make them non-viable.
I always wave on traffic so that I may cross when it is safe. Sometimes, a car stops to let me through, and refuses to move. I won't go, because I can't see the other two lanes past the car that is stopped. Four times in the past year, that car was rear ended by a massive fuckoff truck. For whatever reason, they get pissed off at me, not the guy that rear ended them.
-
Does turning your head/body to face away from that car that refuses to move help much?
-
I only once encountered it in Czechia near Plzen with 2 lanes. Think it took me 5 minutes before I could/dared. Can't imagine it with 3. Crazy dangerous situation. Stay safe!
-
-
-
It took me three attempts to parse
We’re this a 2 lane roundabout,
Your mistake is even harder to type than the correct ‘Were’!
-
Nope, same level of difficulty since the swipe keyboard autocorrect added the unneeded apostrophe.
-
Hate it when that happens!
-
-
Autocorrect fucks me on were we're all the time. I bet that's what happened.
-
Yup. Swipe keyboard.
-
yall need real keyboards.
-
-
-
-
-
There's no pedestrian in the image.
Cars are bad enough as it is that we don't have to imagine more problems with them.
-
Pedestrian would be safer crossing somewhere with a pedestrian crossing
-
A pedestrian would cross between C and D, or even behind D.
-
230 comments