Valve developers continue to impress, fixing Proton in less than a day for the Starfield Beta
Valve developers continue to impress, fixing Proton in less than a day for the Starfield Beta
I applaud the article writer for being one of only 3 people playing starfield currently.
numerous bug fixes, Creation Kit upgrades and there's even a new Very Low graphics setting option.
So the gameplay still sucks, then eh?
STAREFIELD
I swear I've seen some of these faces on my companies teams calls š
They're all just incredibly shocked you're even playing the game.
š
What is it that makes Starfield feel so pointless? like I don't think the gameplay is that much worse than fallout 4 yet I knew I could mod Fallout 4 to be enjoyable but when I played Starfield I just didn't care.
It's hard to sum up an experience in so few words but I'll give it a try:
Fallout 4 has very high point of interest density and is also very colorful and filled with countless little fragments of an exciting culture that is the sci-fi 1950s lost to an atomic war apocalypse.
Starfield is just "you're in space, enjoy it" and leaves you in this uncurated machine crafted literal desert. It's the first of any Bethesda title to officially use procedural generation extensively.
Itās the first of any Bethesda title, to officially use procedural generation extensively.
There's Daggerfall.
To be fair Todd Howard wasnt project leader until Redguard Adventures 1998 and then saved the company from bankruptcy with Morrowind starting in 2000.
But yes you got me there, Daggerfall is an absolutely huge game impossible without procedural generation.
to be fair pre fo3 bethesda and post fo3 bethesda are two different companies. Fallout started with 3 and elder scrolls started with 5.
That's a pretty good summation lol. I played it for maybe 10-12 hours when it came out. And I actually did enjoy a lot of aspects of it. Truly. But it just didn't hold my attention after that little honeymoon period. Once the allure of "cool, I'm doing space stuff" was gone, that was it. Just felt repetitive and grindy after a while.
Itās an open world game that doesnāt have a reason to be open world. The open world is just empty procedurally generated terrain, with occasional creatures or enemies.
I once went exploring outside of one of the main towns. There were a few points of interest, but they were very few and far between. And they werenāt even really fleshed out. They were just sort ofā¦ There. Like youād occasionally find a mercenary base, but there wasnāt anything beyond that. No environmental storytelling, no quest hooks, no purpose. It was obviously just filler content, like they slapped a few structures around the landscape so they could check tasks off of a to-do list.
In older Bethesda games, you could just pick a direction and start walking. Youād stumble upon interesting things fairly quickly, regardless of which direction you picked. But thatās not the case in Starfield. The worlds are almost entirely empty, save for the one or two quest points that pointed you at the planet. It felt less like āSkyrim in spaceā and more like āthe worst parts of Mass Effectās Mako missions, condensed into an entire game.ā
In Fallout or Skyrim you get asked to go somewhere, and on the way you stumble upon 5 new locations, a dungeon containing a unique weapon, and a questline. In Starfield you get asked to go somewhere, so you fast travel into orbit of the destination planet, fast travel onto a 10x10 minute patch of soil, and spend 3 minutes walking to your destination with nothing to do.
