You're viewing a single thread.
Good for her I guess?
- getting the bag ✅
- legal ✅ (but shouldn’t be)
- ethical ❌
- funny ✅
- doesn’t contribute to systemic oppression by the ruling class ✅
i dunno, passes more vibe checks than most disgusting people i hear about these days 🤷♀️
I mean, the only people who got ripped off are Crypto bros soooooo
Nope, she marketed specifically to fans that are new to crypto by saying it's a way to interact with her.
Crypto bros don't fall for those obvious scam , but they fall for other more complex scam like Luna . That's just normal peoples getting robbed by influencer
not true. disturbed by the upvotes at this misconception—crypto bros are the scammers, she marketed to fans who had never touched blockchain before as a fresh market of exploitable cash.
she marketed to fans
fans of the sex meme girl? 🤷♂️
You telling me you wouldn't do literally anything bad luck Brian told you to do?
unfortunately Mr Luck does not have the same levels of raw sexuality and crudeness of Ms Tuah, whose incredible amounts of sexual energy somehow have failed to tempt me to give much of a shit about her except laugh at NL bits using snowclones of her catchphrase.
They rich people Donna. Stupid rich people.
If she promises to make her podcast 'Talk Tuah' go away, then I say we call it squaresies
No lies detected
It's definitely not legal, it's more a matter of 'if' the SEC gets involved than 'can' the SEC get involved.
She made a million+ in fees and facilitated a presale of multiple millions in validation, it definitely contributed to rich getting richer activities.