Morocco (Al Maghrib), or more officially the Kingdom of Morocco (Al Mamlaka al Maghribiya), is a country located in the northwestern edge of the African continent. The name Morocco comes from the Spanish name Marruecos, which itself comes from the name of the city of Marrakesh. In Turkish for example, Morocco is known as Fas, mainly because Turks knew the land of Morocco through the city of Fes. Morocco is regarded as part of the Arab World and Arabic is the main language amongst the population, with French and Berber languages also widely spoken in the country.
Morocco was the home of mostly Berber tribes until the Muslim conquest and the subsequent Arab migrations in the 700s under the Umayyads drastically changed the character of the country. A Berber commander, Tariq ibn Ziyad, would later cross the Strait of Gibraltar (Jabal Tariq) from the northern shores of now-Morocco and conquer Andalusia, which remained under Muslim rule for nearly 800 years. The country emerged as a significant regional power during the Almoravid and Almohad dynasties in the medieval period, known for their contributions to architecture, philosophy, and trade across North Africa and southern Europe. The current ruling dynasty of Morocco, the Alaouite dynasty, came to power in the late 1600s. The Alaouites claim descent from the Prophet Muhammad through his grandson Hasan ibn Ali, giving them religious legitimacy and political authority in the region. Despite the Shia-coded claim to legitimacy, the Moroccan royal family and the population mostly follow the Maliki school of Sunni Islam.
In the early 20th century, the Treaty of Fez (1912) created the French Protectorate of Morocco, negotiated largely without input from the Moroccan people. Moroccan lands were completely divided under French and Spanish zones, with thousands of colonists pouring into the country. The royal family frequently collaborated with colonial powers, suppressing local resistance movements and prioritizing European interests. Prominent anti-colonial uprisings, like the Rif War (1921–1926), were met with brutal crackdowns, enabled by Western-backed forces. Post-independence in 1956, Morocco maintained close ties with its former colonizers, fostering economic dependence on France and Spain. The monarchy’s alignment with Western geopolitical interests often undermined Pan-African and Arab unity movements.
During the Cold War, Morocco positioned itself as a staunch ally of the West, marginalizing leftist and nationalist factions within the country. The Green March of 1975 was a Moroccan state-organized movement to assert control over Western Sahara, a territory decolonized from Spanish rule but still awaiting self-determination. This march, supported by Western powers, particularly the United States, is often criticized as a colonial expansion disguised as a popular movement. By settling Moroccans in the disputed territory, the march disregarded the Sahrawi people's right to sovereignty. U.N. resolutions on Western Sahara have seen limited enforcement, largely due to Morocco’s Western alliances shielding it from accountability. Western-backed security and intelligence partnerships continue to be the cornerstone of Morocco’s repressive nature towards any anti-colonial and leftist movements. In 2021, Algeria again severed diplomatic ties with Morocco, citing hostile actions and concerns over Morocco's ties with Israel, which Algeria views as a betrayal of pro-Palestinian solidarity. The two countries have mostly clashed over the issue of Western Sahara other than a short war in the 60s over a border dispute, with Algeria continuing to support the Sahrawi independence movement.
Morocco's relations with Israel have historically been discreet but significant, rooted in the presence of a large Moroccan Jewish diaspora in Israel. Former King Hassan II played a significant behind-the-scenes role in fostering covert ties between Morocco and Israel during his reign. King Hassan II is reported to have allowed Israeli intelligence access to critical information from a meeting of Arab leaders in Casablanca in 1965, which may have helped Israel prepare for the Six-Day War in 1967. His government provided a platform for discreet diplomatic exchanges and intelligence-sharing, including Morocco’s facilitation of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat’s visit to Israel in the 1970s. In 2020, Morocco formally normalized ties with Israel through the Abraham Accords, brokered by the United States, in exchange for U.S. and Israeli recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara. Diplomatic and trade relations have since deepened, with agreements in fields like defence, agriculture, and technology. Despite official ties, Moroccan public opinion remains largely sympathetic to Palestinians, but such opinions are rarely considered by the royal family.
Morocco's future is split between ambitious global aspirations and permanent domestic issues. The country’s co-hosting of the 2030 FIFA World Cup with Spain and Portugal is seen as a significant opportunity to showcase its shiny infrastructure and global presence. However, these achievements are often overshadowed by criticisms of its political culture, including the monarchy's ceremonial practices, such as the humiliating tradition of publicly kissing the crown prince's hand. Allegations surrounding King Mohammed VI's personal behavior, including incidents of public drunkenness and alleged homosexuality continue to be a hot topic within opposition circles.
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section. Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war. Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis. Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language. https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one. https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts. https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel. https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator. https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps. https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language. https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language. https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses. https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
With the IDF on the cusp of annexing the West Bank and half of Gaza this ceasefire seems like a potential disaster for the Palestinian people. I have absolutely no idea how Hezbollah is faring, or what is happening in Lebanon. I don't want all of the brave fighters in the resistance to be killed, but I hope this is the right call
With the IDF on the cusp of annexing the West Bank and half of Gaza this ceasefire seems like a potential disaster for the Palestinian people. I have absolutely no idea how Hezbollah is faring, or what is happening in Lebanon. I don't want all of the brave fighters in the resistance to be killed, but I hope this is the right call
According to a statement by Netanyahu, a reason that they are doing this is that they want to shift to focusing on the "Iranian threat". Of course, how they intend to deal with this threat when they were unable to break a stalemate with Hezbollah and seize any ground is questionable. It is only possible for them to succeed if they bring in their sugar daddy the United States.
It has already been shown that Israel is unable to protect their airspace against drones and missiles used in saturation strikes. Iran will almost certainly be taking advantage of this knowledge. The Israelis simply don't have enough interceptors to stop the level of saturation Iran can bring to the table.
I mean, I could be forgetting some nuances here, but they engaged in war here in an attempt to combat the genocide of the Palestinians right? If you enter a conflict, suffer heavy losses and don't achieve your goals before you have to stop fighting you arguably lost the conflict.
I'm not saying they're wrong to agree to a ceasefire mind you, the Lebanese people were suffering greatly from bombardment from the zionist entity and I don't know how much more capacity to fight they had.
EDIT: when I made this comment I thought that Hezbollah itself had agreed to this ceasefire, now it's sounding like the Lebanese government did though.
Is Hezbollah even party to the agreement? Everything I'm seeing is that Israel agreed to a ceasefire with a government that is not conducting hostilities against them without talking to Hezbollah at all.
If it were a cease fire with Hezbollah nobody would be talking about a cease fire with Lebanon.
If Hezbollah were a signatory they wouldn't be agreeing to withdraw troops. They would never do that when they are winning and they would never trust the army to secure the border.
This is an agreement for the Lebanese army to take over southern Lebanon while isisrael withdraws. If Hezbollah doesn't withdraw they will be at odds with the Lebanese army not with isisrael and then we will possibly get a civil war depending on whether Hezbollah and Lebanon decide to force the issue.
Its the western puppet government being brought in to stop Hezbollah because isisrael can't do it because they suck.
Israels war goal for the invasion was to stop Hezbollah rockets so that the settlers could return to the north. If settlers return then Israel was successful.
That's true on the one hand but on the other an entire generation of settlers there will know that they can't be protected. Even small escalations will cause mass fear and disruption in the North.
Withdrawing north of that river to let in obviously compromised Lebanese forces. If there is a new civil war, you will have sunnis, marrionitws and the literal French holding down what should be shia heartland.
I seriously doubt Trump and Netanyahu will trust the UN which is why they wrote in their keep bombing clause. This feels like a delay to get french troops in, troops that will be taking orders from the national front soon.
Their entire leadership and command structure, withdrawing north of the Litani river, ceding authority in many territories to the Lebanese Government, allowing French/American forces into Lebanon to aid the Lebanese government. This is a trend towards the elimination of Hezbollah, with the de jure Lebanese government and UN forces coming in to stop the conflict. Israel will have pressure on it eliminated and no concessions were won towards protecting Palestine.
Just because they say they want to annex the West Bank does not mean they can. Hamas would not be supporting the ceasefire if they thought it meant an end to Gaza’s resistance
Just because they say they want to annex the West Bank does not mean they can. Hamas would not be supporting the ceasefire if they thought it meant an end to Gaza’s resistance
They are supporting the ceasefire because they are in communications with Hezbollah and apparently it has reached the end of its capacity to fight and must surrender. They're not going to publicly attack an ally for being defeated, they will thank them and continue the fight - but this is terrible news.