You're viewing part of a thread.
I just cannot fathom in anyway whatsoever where the show being different causes such intense feelings in people that an argument needs to be made to distance itself from the rest of Star Trek in general.
People have expectations of things based on past experience. If those expectations aren't met some people won't like it. See also: Episodes 1-3 and 4-6 of Star Wars.
It’s not quite the same as when syndication was readily availab.e. TV in general has moved into an era with shorter seasons and more linked together narratives.
This is absolutely true, and the change in format is probably a big part of why it feels so different. Thanks to modern VFX, widescreen filming, and modern production techniques they could make it more cinematic. This is why it feels so different from shows that required glitter in water for the transporter effect and were shown on 13" CRT TVs.
Star Trek screams diversity from the top to the bottom and fans seem to be fine with that until it touches the TV shows themselves and if it’s not the exact same carbon copied and outdated format then it’s a problem?
I've never said the diversity was a problem, I said the cinematography, pacing, and story structure wasn't the same as other series. But I've realized that it's different from other series in the same way that TOS and TMP are radically different from each other in format while still being Star Trek.
But thank you for reminding me not to ever post an opinion on Discovery again because I'm gonna get into a flamewar with someone I like and respect and that makes me sad.
People have expectations of things based on past experience. If those expectations aren’t met some people won’t like it. See also: Episodes 1-3 and 4-6 of Star Wars.
Star Wars is probably not the best example considering literally everything since A New Hope has been complained about by fans in some regard. Empire Strikes Back was critically panned at release and even Return of the Jedi had some complaints. Then literally every movie since has had fans rabid. Moreover, Star Wars didn't paint itself as a paragon of diversity.
But thank you for reminding me not to ever post an opinion on Discovery again because I’m gonna get into a flamewar with someone I like and respect and that makes me sad.
I asked questions because I just did not get where you were coming from. You started all of this by saying that it wasn't real Trek. You don't get to complain when someone calls you out on gatekepeing behavior. I'm not getting into a flamewar over an opinion, I was questioning you over your gatekeeping because I find that to be antithetical to everything that Star Trek stands for. I'm sorry that you're upset here but you said that Star Trek Discovery wasn't real Star Trek and then are surprised that the dude who is named after a Discovery character and who is known for defending Discovery.... defended Discovery?
I forgot the rules. Sorry.
Alright man.
These points being interpreted as "gatekeeping" is wild.
The first comment was literally "I like Discovery but it's not real Trek".
That is textbook gatekeeping.
I disagree because someone sharing their opinion does not limit others from accessing the content. Edit if others aren't targeted during the opinion sharing
Someone saying "blue isn't a good color" doesn't make blue less accessible, and their opinion isn't authoritative in some access based way.
Gatekeeping to me would be flaming someone if they don't know some nuance about some character in one particular episode then saying they shouldn't be watching trek at all. They aren't a "real fan."
But we disagree on this most likely. I didn't @ you or reply to you directly as I didn't want to slap fight. I was just discussing with OP who has since deleted. So, dead thread I guess. To be clear: I was addressing the votes primarily.
The original statement surely is a weak opinion on its own, which was hashed out below.
I disagree because someone sharing their opinion does not limit others from accessing the content.
That's not what gatekeeping in fandom is. Gatekeeping is to claim that either some content is not real <franchise> or that some fan is not a real fan of <franchise> because of <opinion>. That is exactly what OP did by claiming that Discovery was not 'real Trek'. They then listed stuff that were personal opinions and ways that they felt about the show as an example of why it isn't Real Trek. They then changed tact entirely when the gatekeeping was pointed out and admitted they were wrong.
They were gatekeeping. This isn't a matter of opinion, that was a matter of fact. You can disagree with that but you'd be wrong. Gatekeeping has no business in any franchise, nevermind Star Trek.
Edit.meh this isn't worth it
I'll edit and close by saying I DO agree with your final sentence. That is very true.