"Famous" AI Artist Says He's Losing Millions of Dollars From People Stealing His Work
"Famous" AI Artist Says He's Losing Millions of Dollars From People Stealing His Work
The guy who used Midjourney to create an award-winning piece of AI art demands copyright protections.
cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/3613920
Get fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked
“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”
"But I still want to get paid for it."
You're viewing part of a thread.
it's still antropomorphisation.
Cool for drag. Mind if other people don't give a crap about what drag thinks?
14 1 ReplyDrag thinks that if your opinion is that treating things like otherkin is anthropomorphisation, then you must be anthropomorphising otherkin.
2 23 ReplyIt's not any kind of "kin". It's a statistical model. It's about as sentient as a Gaussian blur is.
12 1 ReplyYou are a statistical model, and drag does not go around telling people you are not sentient.
3 16 ReplyYou are a statistical model
No I am not. Different onthological entities, donkey.
8 1 ReplyDrag chooses to respect your identity as a non-statistical model. Drag's opinions are not as important as the way you feel, and drag will make an effort to avoid upsetting you by referring to you in the wrong way.
2 14 ReplyThis is not about identification. I am a human (which is not a social construct) which exists in the real world. Statistical models don't exist in an onthological sense.
8 1 ReplyDrag wonders whether you've changed your mind about LLMs being statistical models, or whether you've decided there's no such thing as LLMs.
2 17 ReplyThey don't exist in an onthological sense, yes. (They are completely deontological; they don't exist in the real world via representation, like vectors or matrices)
5 1 Reply
Does drag have proof that the other user is a statistical model, or is drag guilty of dehumanizing others to fit drag's agenda just like a Nazi would?
5 2 ReplyA human is a kind of statistical model, so drag's comment does not imply any specific amount of humanity, either small or large.
4 17 Reply[Citation needed.]
6 0 Reply