I just added some max_speed= tags for #OpenStreetMap in Bloomington, Indiana.
I just added some max_speed= tags for #OpenStreetMap in Bloomington, Indiana.
I just added some max_speed= tags for #OpenStreetMap in Bloomington, Indiana.
Our city code has a default speed limit 25 mph. Exceptions are published in a table in the city code.
It seems possible that adding the correct lower-than-default speed limits from city code to OpenStreetMap could reduce the likelihood that routing algorithms would route car traffic there, which could in turn keep the street safer for other road users.
Ref: https://library.municode.com/in/bloomington/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15VETR_CH15.24SPRE
You're viewing part of a thread.
@pleaseclap @DemonHusky @bloomington_in I’ve looked at the code. My servers have bike routing coverage for most of the US and EU with the OpenTripPlanner and Valhalla engines. Occasionally we find edge cases that don’t route optimally and look into patches.
Lots of roads don’t have max speeds in OpenStreetMap which they both use, so other signals are essential.
@markstos @DemonHusky @bloomington_in
You've seen your specialty bike routing algorithms. I'm glad they're good algorithms, however
your first post is about misrepresenting speed limits in OpenStreetMap (which is a community resource, yes?) to effect driver behavior, and what systemic effects this would have for every user of every tool that uses OpenStreetMap
Even if you don't think this will lead to congestion on the same roads, I'm not sure it's ethical
@pleaseclap @DemonHusky @bloomington_in Misrepresentating? I found streets where the max_speed value was missing and added the correct values based on city code.
@markstos @DemonHusky @bloomington_in
Is that not your suggestion, here?
"It seems possible that adding lower-than-default speed limits to OpenStreetMap could reduce the likelihood that routing algorithms would route car traffic there, which could in turn keep the street safer for other road users."
@pleaseclap @DemonHusky @bloomington_in In context, the rest of the post says that exceptions are published in city code and provides an example link to the table in our code.
I’m suggesting to use real speed limits from city code. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
@markstos @DemonHusky @bloomington_in So the situation is, lots of low-speed streets are currently assigned a higher speed by default in OSS, and fixing that is a helpful service?
That's my bad: sorry for being a deviant who assumes the worst
@pleaseclap @DemonHusky @bloomington_in Yes. Many routing services, including Google Maps, use OpenStreetMap data to some degree. The more accurate the data is, in general the better the algorithms can work.
If you know of times where you think you haven’t been given the best bike directions, the issue might be solved by updating something in OpenStreetMap. Which like Wikipedia, anyone can edit and it’s not to hard to get started.
@markstos @pleaseclap @bloomington_in last year a group of us we confused why Cambridge was so poorly rated on the People For Bikes city ratings and realized that the city changed most street's speed limits. After going through and fixing them in OSM, this year Cambridge jumped up significantly to be rated much closer to what I'd expect.
@DemonHusky @pleaseclap @bloomington_in Ah, so the correct speed limit needed to be lowered in OSM?
@markstos @pleaseclap @bloomington_in yeah, I think when the state database was imported many years ago it included the at the time correct speed limits for streets, though most of them were unsigned. Then a couple of years ago the city reduced most streets with signs to be safer, but no one got around to fixing OSM.