You're viewing a single thread.
Modern researchers have demonstrated how to saw through stone with the tools that were available to Ancient Egyptians, but I'm pretty sure they used alien tech because that sounds like fun.
Social media lets stupid people spread their dumbass ideas and makes the whole of society stupider.
Its basically a copper tube or a lumberjack style copper 'saw' (which does not actually have teeth) + a guy consistently adding sand.
The tube drills were used with a contraption resembling an archery bow somewhat, with the string looped around the tube, such that you could draw the bow back and forth to 'drill'.
There are multiple, detailed, hieroglyph inscribed picture/diagrams showing how this was done, made by people commemorating the construction itself.
Archaeologists have even reconstructed and tested these methods in our time, and big surprise, they work.
Primitive Technology has a great video showing a couple ways string was used to drive tools. Great channel in general for seeing not only old tools, but how each one was experimented on and refined over time.
Don't forget near unlimited manual labor. Don't need power when you can just toss more slaves at the problem.
First part is true, lots and LOTs of people.
The second part does not seem to be true though.
IIRC, the current mainstream idea is that when huge amounts of bulk labor were needed, this was not actually slave labor.
Basically, the common farmers would take a seasonal break from working the land and basically all be sort of conscripted into this bulk manual labor, for which they were housed and fed and I think even paid a bit, with the funding for all this coming out of the taxes they paid from their agricultural produce.
Also, a good deal of the more specialized engineering and stone masonry work was done by craftsmen, who were paid a wage.
Note that when I say things like wage and tax, often this was done not in monetary terms, but with payment in widely tradeable, widely valuable goods like grain or cattle or pottery.
Coined money did not become prevalent until fairly far into the total history of ancient Egypt.
There were servants and slaves of various kinds, but the maximum proportion of the population that were slaves was probably around 10%, and that is in the Middle Kingdom, not the Old Kingdom when most of the great architectural marvels were built.
The majority of labor provided to ancient Egyptian grand works were done by peasants who were compensated, and likely would have viewed being able to partake in such projects as a kind of great and holy honor.
I think the difference between employee and slave is much less than we might think in today's terms.
The workers were there by choice, and they were treated well enough to want to be there, but I don't think most of them were paid a wage.
Per the "fall of civilizations" podcast they were indeed compensated and treated well.
I have not read their sources so I can't confirm, but I have no reason to disbelieve them.
I too am a fan of fall of civilisations!
What does "compensated well" mean in this context though? There was no currency with which to pay. I thought compensation was mostly food, beer, and lodging.
In an age of no currency existing, what other pay would have been good compensation in your mind?
Land or livestock.
Good point there, I forgot livestock was a thing.
Ehh, "Slaves did it" is still still more accurate than "aliens did it" if you judge it on a sliding scale.
Do you have a source for this? I have long speculated that the pyramids were a massive make-work program, I just never bought the idea that there were just tons of slaves doing that work. Obviously Ancient Egypt was a slave society, but where did all of the slaves come from? If Egyptians like enslaved an army or like another city that was so massive that they needed to find extra work for them, building megalithic structures, etc., how do they make sure the slaves don't revolt? They would need many more slave masters, more slave catchers, etc., and where do those people come from? The political economy of Pyramids being built by slaves doesn't add up. They must have been excess labor. I'm no expert but the back of the napkin math always seemed really fishy to me.
Edit: oh I see the "fall of civilizations recommendation further down, I'll check it out
Once again, the instructions were all there.. we just needed to RTFM
Aliens built the pyramids because they were impressed by the Egyptians' engineering skill and technology. They didn't build any pyramids in Europe because white people sucked at engineering
New favorite theory.
“Ancient Egyptians… I’m pretty sure they used alien tech”
~@some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
Cool if I use your quote for my substack?
This is the first time I've seen someone from threads show up in Lemmy comments. I'm not sure how I feel about that. My first thought is that I don't like it.
“This is the first time I’ve seen someone from threads show up in Lemmy comments. I… like it.”
~@some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
“Modern researchers have demonstrated how...Ancient Egyptians…used alien tech”
~@some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
Fixed it for you.
Modern ... Egyptians ... used alien ... Social media ... and ... society
FTFY
😂
Even the whole "how did they move all those stones to the pyramid sites, and how did the tip of this Pramod end up all the way over here?!"
Egypt is full of ancient River systems that have long dried up and been covered by sands. They used those to move all the material, but since they're gonna and dried up now, we just scratch our heads and wonder how they got there.
We have also literally found shockingly well preserved sleds that match up with the diagrams depicting when the stones had to be moved over land (drawn by tens to hundreds of people).
More people need to learn that the African Humid Period was a thing.
So the great pyramid took twenty years to build by hand, right.
Amazing.
22 years
Sounds good.
Right? It took hard work and back breaking labor.
I think they used copper "saws" and then put sand under the saw so the sand would cut the stone as you pushed the saw over it.